public-ws-semann@w3.org from June 2006 by subject

[issue 10] can you give more details ?

[issue10] what about multiple categories ?

[pierre.chatel@fr.thalesgroup.com: [Moderator Action (size limit exceeded)] [Updated Draft v1.1] SAWSDL to UDDI and WSDL 2.0 to UDDI mapping]

[Updated Draft v1.3] SAWSDL to UDDI and WSDL 2.0 to UDDI mapping

Action Item: RDFS ontology for interface

action on category vs modelReference

Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2006/06/06

Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2006/06/13

Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2006/06/27

Consistency Issues in multiple modelReferences

Documentation of Issue 5 and 6

Draft minutes of telcon 2006/06/06

Draft minutes of telcon 2006/06/13

Draft minutes of telcon 2006/06/27

email headers (was Re: ACTION 07)

First draft of SAWSDL to UDDI and WSDL 2.0 to UDDI mapping

Fwd: Generating test data sets

issue 1 resolution

issue 18: Relation of multiple modelReferences

Issue 2 documented

Issue 23: relationship of interface annotations in face of interface extension

Issue : should mappings be bijections? what happens if they are not?

Issues 18 and 6 (partial) have been documented

Mapping SAWSDL/WSDL-S into UDDI

regrets

Resolutions from f2f documented for review

SAWSDL and "effects"

SAWSDL Category [section 2.3 of Semantic Annotations for WSDL ]

SAWSDL Category [section 2.3 of Semantic Annotations for WSDL]

schemaMapping issues breakdown (issue 6)

Summary and draft minutes of f2f meeting 2006/06/20-21

What does modelReference on wsdl:interface mean ?

why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11)

why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11): allowing internal and external ModelReferences on the same element

Last message date: Friday, 30 June 2006 21:09:19 UTC