- From: Laurent Henocque <laurent.henocque@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 14:01:16 +0200
- To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- CC: Holger Lausen <holger.lausen@deri.org>, SAWSDL WG <public-ws-semann@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I agree with Holger.
Jacek Kopecky wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> with the addition of the small RDF ontology for categories, I think your
> proposal makes a lot of sense. Anybody else has any opinion? 8-)
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jacek
>
> On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 18:00 +0200, Holger Lausen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> to address the still pending action to start a discussion on issue 10 [1]:
>>
>> My proposal is to drop the recommendation to use the complex type
>> sawsdl:category for the annotation of wsdl:interface. Instead a model
>> reference should be used. We might publish a small rdfs ontology as
>> additional note that defines the structure of the semantic model similar
>> to what is done in the complex:type.
>>
>> Rational:
>>
>> * It is inconsistent to once talk about semantic models and to only
>> reference them (not assuming anything about how they are expressed) and
>> for category we require them to be expressed as xml instance of a
>> particular complex type.
>>
>> * It is arbitrary choice to define this structure for category, but not
>> for provider, availability, etc.
>>
>> kind regards
>> Holger
>>
>> (Sorry I end up repeating my arguments - but so far nobody could
>> convince me that they are invalid ;)
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/issues/#x10
>>
>>
>
>
>
- --
*************************************************************************
Laurent Henocque
Maître de Conférences Hdr
tel: +33 6 83 88 20 01
Enseignant à l'Ecole Supérieure d'Ingénieurs de Luminy - Marseille
http://www.esil.univ-mrs.fr
Chercheur au Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Information et des Systèmes - Marseille
http://www.lsis.org
clé publique open pgp / open pgp public key :
http://www.esil.univ-mrs.fr/~henocque/0x987E183.pub.asc
************************************************************************
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEhW6MIF1tz5h+GDARArztAJwJ5F+Uq//itFNPF0R3u3BG97pgUQCdGtRJ
/f7pOGGiKYRkBDdAKgY9hjs=
=OiHA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2006 12:01:31 UTC