public-ws-semann@w3.org from June 2006 by author

Amit Sheth @ LSDIS

• Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11): allowing internal and external ModelReferences on the same element (Tuesday, 6 June)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: SAWSDL and "effects" (Sunday, 11 June)

Carine Bournez

• Re: [Updated Draft v1.3] SAWSDL to UDDI and WSDL 2.0 to UDDI mapping (Wednesday, 21 June)
• [pierre.chatel@fr.thalesgroup.com: [Moderator Action (size limit exceeded)] [Updated Draft v1.1] SAWSDL to UDDI and WSDL 2.0 to UDDI mapping] (Thursday, 15 June)
• First draft of SAWSDL to UDDI and WSDL 2.0 to UDDI mapping (Tuesday, 13 June)

Farrukh Najmi

• Re: Mapping SAWSDL/WSDL-S into UDDI (Tuesday, 6 June)

Holger Lausen

• Re: issue 1 resolution (Monday, 19 June)

Jacek Kopecky

• Draft minutes of telcon 2006/06/27 (Wednesday, 28 June)
• Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2006/06/27 (Monday, 26 June)
• Summary and draft minutes of f2f meeting 2006/06/20-21 (Monday, 26 June)
• Draft minutes of telcon 2006/06/13 (Tuesday, 13 June)
• Re: issue 18: Relation of multiple modelReferences (Tuesday, 13 June)
• Re: Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2006/06/13 (Tuesday, 13 June)
• issue 18: Relation of multiple modelReferences (Monday, 12 June)
• Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2006/06/13 (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11) (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: SAWSDL Category [section 2.3 of Semantic Annotations for WSDL] (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: Mapping SAWSDL/WSDL-S into UDDI (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11): allowing internal and external ModelReferences on the same element (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: SAWSDL and "effects" (Saturday, 10 June)
• Draft minutes of telcon 2006/06/06 (Thursday, 8 June)
• Fwd: Generating test data sets (Tuesday, 6 June)
• Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11) (Tuesday, 6 June)
• Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11) (Tuesday, 6 June)
• Re: Issue : should mappings be bijections? what happens if they are not? (Tuesday, 6 June)
• Re: Issue : should mappings be bijections? what happens if they are not? (Tuesday, 6 June)
• Re: schemaMapping issues breakdown (issue 6) (Tuesday, 6 June)
• Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11) (Tuesday, 6 June)
• Agenda for SAWSDL telcon 2006/06/06 (Monday, 5 June)
• why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11) (Monday, 5 June)
• Re: schemaMapping issues breakdown (issue 6) (Monday, 5 June)
• Re: action on category vs modelReference (Monday, 5 June)
• Re: schemaMapping issues breakdown (issue 6) (Monday, 5 June)
• RE: Consistency Issues in multiple modelReferences (Monday, 5 June)
• Re: email headers (was Re: ACTION 07) (Monday, 5 June)
• Re: Issue 2 documented (Monday, 5 June)

Jim Hendler

• SAWSDL and "effects" (Thursday, 8 June)

Joel Farrell

• regrets (Friday, 30 June)
• Resolutions from f2f documented for review (Monday, 26 June)
• Issues 18 and 6 (partial) have been documented (Thursday, 15 June)
• Re: Documentation of Issue 5 and 6 (Tuesday, 13 June)
• Documentation of Issue 5 and 6 (Thursday, 8 June)
• Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11) (Tuesday, 6 June)

Kunal Verma

• Issue 23: relationship of interface annotations in face of interface extension (Friday, 30 June)
• What does modelReference on wsdl:interface mean ? (Friday, 30 June)
• Action Item: RDFS ontology for interface (Monday, 12 June)
• Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11) (Tuesday, 6 June)
• Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11) (Monday, 5 June)
• Re: schemaMapping issues breakdown (issue 6) (Monday, 5 June)

Laurent Henocque

• Re: schemaMapping issues breakdown (issue 6) (Tuesday, 13 June)
• Re: Documentation of Issue 5 and 6 (Tuesday, 13 June)
• Re: Issue : should mappings be bijections? what happens if they are not? (Tuesday, 13 June)
• Re: issue 18: Relation of multiple modelReferences (Tuesday, 13 June)
• Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11): allowing internal and external ModelReferences on the same element (Tuesday, 13 June)
• Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11) (Tuesday, 13 June)
• Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11) (Tuesday, 6 June)
• Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11) (Tuesday, 6 June)
• Issue : should mappings be bijections? what happens if they are not? (Tuesday, 6 June)
• Re: action on category vs modelReference (Tuesday, 6 June)

Pierre Chatel

• [issue 10] can you give more details ? (Thursday, 22 June)
• [Updated Draft v1.3] SAWSDL to UDDI and WSDL 2.0 to UDDI mapping (Tuesday, 20 June)

Pierre Châtel

• SAWSDL Category [section 2.3 of Semantic Annotations for WSDL] (Thursday, 8 June)

Pierre.CHATEL@fr.thalesgroup.com

• [issue10] what about multiple categories ? (Friday, 23 June)
• RE: issue 1 resolution (Tuesday, 20 June)
• issue 1 resolution (Thursday, 15 June)
• RE: SAWSDL Category [section 2.3 of Semantic Annotations for WSDL ] (Monday, 12 June)
• RE: Mapping SAWSDL/WSDL-S into UDDI (Monday, 12 June)
• Mapping SAWSDL/WSDL-S into UDDI (Tuesday, 6 June)

Rama Akkiraju

• Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11) (Monday, 5 June)
• Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11) (Monday, 5 June)
• Re: schemaMapping issues breakdown (issue 6) (Monday, 5 June)
• Re: why distinguish between simple and complex types? (issue 11) (Monday, 5 June)
• Re: schemaMapping issues breakdown (issue 6) (Sunday, 4 June)

Tomas Vitvar

• Regrets (Tuesday, 6 June)

Last message date: Friday, 30 June 2006 21:09:19 UTC