Re: Documentation of Issue 5 and 6

Hi Laurent,

I agree.  We are planning to restructure section 2 of the spec.  I am
anticipating that after today's call it we can proceed with this work and
problems like the one you point out will be removed.

Regards,
Joel
Laurent Henocque <laurent.henocque@gmail.com> wrote on 06/13/2006 07:00:04
AM:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi, please note that the title of section 2.2 Schema mapping does
> not agree with the contents, mostly devoted to complex
> type annotation.
> Laurent
>
> Joel Farrell wrote:
> > Jacek,
> >
> > Issue 5 is now documented in section 2.  Examples have not been
updated,
> > but that will be done when we further restructure section 2 once the
rest
> > of schema mapping and related issues become more clear.
> >
> > The part of issue 6 we resolved is also documented in section 2.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Joel
> >
> >
> >
>
> - --
> *************************************************************************
> Laurent Henocque
> Maître de Conférences Hdr
> tel: +33 6 83 88 20 01
> Enseignant à l'Ecole Supérieure d'Ingénieurs de Luminy - Marseille
>     http://www.esil.univ-mrs.fr
> Chercheur au Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Information et des
> Systèmes - Marseille
>     http://www.lsis.org
>
> clé publique open pgp / open pgp public key :
> http://www.esil.univ-mrs.fr/~henocque/0x987E183.pub.asc
> ************************************************************************
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFEjpq0IF1tz5h+GDARApQOAJ4j7z6+SsuVwM33i6HQMXuno9H0fwCfWXbS
> BkbEo1GAUmJP0E2t4lAL+ag=
> =icIG
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Tuesday, 13 June 2006 12:49:55 UTC