public-w3process@w3.org from April 2014 by thread

New Editor's draft. Charles McCathie Nevile (Wednesday, 30 April)

Meeting record: 2014-04-28 Chapter 7 Task Force Ralph Swick (Monday, 28 April)

Time for Process Document Chapter 7 Task Force meeting on next Monday, 28 April Stephen Zilles (Thursday, 24 April)

Towards consistent and transparent evaluation of new WG proposals Arthur Barstow (Thursday, 24 April)

New Editor's draft of Process Charles McCathie Nevile (Thursday, 24 April)

Update on Process Document Chapter 7 Task Force meeting on next Monday, 28 April Stephen Zilles (Wednesday, 23 April)

w3process-ISSUE-96 (Errata Pages): Should there be clear requirements on maintaining errata? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 23 April)

w3process-ISSUE-95 (Clarify Rec->Edited Rec): Clarify the process of moving from REC to edited REC [Document life cycle (ch 7)] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 23 April)

w3process-ISSUE-94 (Declined transition announcements): Who should be informed when a transition is declined, and of what? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 23 April)

w3process-ISSUE-93 (joint specs): What should the requirements be for specifications produced by more than one WG? Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 23 April)

Process Document Chapter 7 Task Force meeting on next Monday, 28 April Stephen Zilles (Tuesday, 22 April)

Re: Feedback from Liam Quin - Fwd: Re: Staff contacts review of draft Chapter 7 revision Charles McCathie Nevile (Tuesday, 22 April)

Reminder: April 21 deadline for comments re revisions to the Technical Reports process Arthur Barstow (Wednesday, 9 April)

Re: [Pubrules] Proposed changes regarding references to editors' drafts Arthur Barstow (Monday, 7 April)

Re: W3C needs a Dashboard Arthur Barstow (Friday, 4 April)

ISSUE-92: What is the process and requirements for an external organization to seek the consortium's brand for their event? Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 3 April)

ISSUE-91: Should the consortium use community tools (such as an external organization like http://lanyrd.com/dashboard/) for event management? Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 3 April)

ISSUE-90: What is the process and criteria for determining requests for w3c branding for relevant events hosted by external organizations? Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 3 April)

ISSUE-89: Should the w3c create a centralized curated calendar of its events including relevant external events? Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 3 April)

ISSUE-88: The events section of procdoc-2005 is arcane and needs updating Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 3 April)

Re: W3C events classification Arthur Barstow (Wednesday, 2 April)

Proposal for "Community Meetup" experiment -- was RE: Summary and minutes of 4-5 March 2014 Advisory Board face-to-face meeting Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) (Tuesday, 1 April)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2014 23:27:54 UTC