public-w3process@w3.org from April 2014 by author

Arthur Barstow

• Re: Towards consistent and transparent evaluation of new WG proposals (Thursday, 24 April)
• Towards consistent and transparent evaluation of new WG proposals (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-94 (Declined transition announcements): Who should be informed when a transition is declined, and of what? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-94 (Declined transition announcements): Who should be informed when a transition is declined, and of what? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Reminder: April 21 deadline for comments re revisions to the Technical Reports process (Thursday, 10 April)
• Reminder: April 21 deadline for comments re revisions to the Technical Reports process (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: [Pubrules] Proposed changes regarding references to editors' drafts (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: W3C needs a Dashboard (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: W3C needs a Dashboard (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: W3C events classification (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: W3C events classification (Wednesday, 2 April)

Charles McCathie Nevile

• New Editor's draft. (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-95 (Clarify Rec->Edited Rec): Clarify the process of moving from REC to edited REC [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Wednesday, 30 April)
• New Editor's draft of Process (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-94 (Declined transition announcements): Who should be informed when a transition is declined, and of what? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Feedback from Liam Quin - Fwd: Re: Staff contacts review of draft Chapter 7 revision (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Feedback from Liam Quin - Fwd: Re: Staff contacts review of draft Chapter 7 revision (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-94 (Declined transition announcements): Who should be informed when a transition is declined, and of what? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Feedback from Liam Quin - Fwd: Re: Staff contacts review of draft Chapter 7 revision (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: Reminder: April 21 deadline for comments re revisions to the Technical Reports process (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: W3C events classification (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: ISSUE-88: The events section of procdoc-2005 is arcane and needs updating (Friday, 4 April)

Ian Jacobs

• Re: Towards consistent and transparent evaluation of new WG proposals (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: w3process-ISSUE-94 (Declined transition announcements): Who should be informed when a transition is declined, and of what? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Process Document Chapter 7 Task Force meeting on next Monday, 28 April (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: W3C needs a Dashboard (Friday, 4 April)
• Re: W3C needs a Dashboard (Friday, 4 April)

Jean-Charles (JC) Verdié

• Re: ISSUE-88: The events section of procdoc-2005 is arcane and needs updating (Friday, 4 April)

Jeff Jaffe

• Re: W3C events classification (Friday, 4 April)

Marcos Caceres

• Re: W3C events classification (Wednesday, 2 April)

Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)

• RE: Towards consistent and transparent evaluation of new WG proposals (Thursday, 24 April)
• Proposal for "Community Meetup" experiment -- was RE: Summary and minutes of 4-5 March 2014 Advisory Board face-to-face meeting (Tuesday, 1 April)

Olle Olsson

• Re: W3C events classification (Thursday, 3 April)

Ralph Swick

• Meeting record: 2014-04-28 Chapter 7 Task Force (Monday, 28 April)

Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker

• w3process-ISSUE-96 (Errata Pages): Should there be clear requirements on maintaining errata? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Wednesday, 23 April)
• w3process-ISSUE-95 (Clarify Rec->Edited Rec): Clarify the process of moving from REC to edited REC [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Wednesday, 23 April)
• w3process-ISSUE-94 (Declined transition announcements): Who should be informed when a transition is declined, and of what? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Wednesday, 23 April)
• w3process-ISSUE-93 (joint specs): What should the requirements be for specifications produced by more than one WG? (Wednesday, 23 April)
• ISSUE-92: What is the process and requirements for an external organization to seek the consortium's brand for their event? (Thursday, 3 April)
• ISSUE-91: Should the consortium use community tools (such as an external organization like http://lanyrd.com/dashboard/) for event management? (Thursday, 3 April)
• ISSUE-90: What is the process and criteria for determining requests for w3c branding for relevant events hosted by external organizations? (Thursday, 3 April)
• ISSUE-89: Should the w3c create a centralized curated calendar of its events including relevant external events? (Thursday, 3 April)
• ISSUE-88: The events section of procdoc-2005 is arcane and needs updating (Thursday, 3 April)

Stephen Zilles

• RE: w3process-ISSUE-95 (Clarify Rec->Edited Rec): Clarify the process of moving from REC to edited REC [Document life cycle (ch 7)] (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Time for Process Document Chapter 7 Task Force meeting on next Monday, 28 April (Thursday, 24 April)
• Update on Process Document Chapter 7 Task Force meeting on next Monday, 28 April (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Process Document Chapter 7 Task Force meeting on next Monday, 28 April (Tuesday, 22 April)
• RE: Reminder: April 21 deadline for comments re revisions to the Technical Reports process (Thursday, 10 April)
• RE: W3C events classification (Thursday, 3 April)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2014 23:27:54 UTC