- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:16:42 -0500
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
On Apr 23, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/23/14 11:51 AM, Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> w3process-ISSUE-94 (Declined transition announcements): Who should be informed when a transition is declined, and of what? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] >> >> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/94 >> >> Raised by: Charles McCathie Nevile >> On product: Document life cycle (ch 7) >> >> Liam Quin raises the suggestion, in his review of Chapter 7 [1] that when a transition request is declined, the Director should inform the AC and chairs of the reason a transition is declined, and that the information should be at the same confidentiality level as the work of the Group - i.e. for a group that works in public the information should be public. > > Anyone have any `real data` on the number of TransReqs made vs. the number actually declined? Hi Art, Here's the report I got back: * From time to time in response to a transition request we ask a group to fix things. * No group has refused to fix things. * Therefore we have never declined a request (after fixes). Even if there's some case we've forgotten, the answer is "near zero declines." Ian -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2014 21:16:45 UTC