Towards consistent and transparent evaluation of new WG proposals

• From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
• Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:59:47 -0400
• To: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <535918D3.3090209@gmail.com>

[ Bcc: w3c-ac-forum ]

A recent discussion about a proposal to create a new WG to continue work 
started by a CG raised some general questions about the process used to 
evaluate such proposals [1]. I created a document to capture some of the 
related questions and considerations [2].

Perhaps [something like] this can be used as the basis of a framework to 
create more consistent and transparent criteria when evaluation new WG 
proposals?

Comments on this doc are welcome but please send them to 
public-w3process and as always, please do feel free to directly update 
this document.
​​
-Thanks, AB

[1] 
<https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2014AprJun/0015.html>
[2] <https://www.w3.org/wiki/AdvisoryCommittee/NewWGProposals>

Received on Thursday, 24 April 2014 14:00:18 UTC