Wednesday, 30 April 2014
- New Editor's draft.
- RE: w3process-ISSUE-95 (Clarify Rec->Edited Rec): Clarify the process of moving from REC to edited REC [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-95 (Clarify Rec->Edited Rec): Clarify the process of moving from REC to edited REC [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
Monday, 28 April 2014
Thursday, 24 April 2014
- Re: Towards consistent and transparent evaluation of new WG proposals
- RE: Towards consistent and transparent evaluation of new WG proposals
- Time for Process Document Chapter 7 Task Force meeting on next Monday, 28 April
- Re: Towards consistent and transparent evaluation of new WG proposals
- Towards consistent and transparent evaluation of new WG proposals
- New Editor's draft of Process
Wednesday, 23 April 2014
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-94 (Declined transition announcements): Who should be informed when a transition is declined, and of what? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-94 (Declined transition announcements): Who should be informed when a transition is declined, and of what? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-94 (Declined transition announcements): Who should be informed when a transition is declined, and of what? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
- Re: Feedback from Liam Quin - Fwd: Re: Staff contacts review of draft Chapter 7 revision
- Re: Feedback from Liam Quin - Fwd: Re: Staff contacts review of draft Chapter 7 revision
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-94 (Declined transition announcements): Who should be informed when a transition is declined, and of what? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
- Update on Process Document Chapter 7 Task Force meeting on next Monday, 28 April
- w3process-ISSUE-96 (Errata Pages): Should there be clear requirements on maintaining errata? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
- w3process-ISSUE-95 (Clarify Rec->Edited Rec): Clarify the process of moving from REC to edited REC [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-94 (Declined transition announcements): Who should be informed when a transition is declined, and of what? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
- w3process-ISSUE-94 (Declined transition announcements): Who should be informed when a transition is declined, and of what? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
- w3process-ISSUE-93 (joint specs): What should the requirements be for specifications produced by more than one WG?
- Re: Process Document Chapter 7 Task Force meeting on next Monday, 28 April
Tuesday, 22 April 2014
- Process Document Chapter 7 Task Force meeting on next Monday, 28 April
- Re: Feedback from Liam Quin - Fwd: Re: Staff contacts review of draft Chapter 7 revision
Thursday, 10 April 2014
- Re: Reminder: April 21 deadline for comments re revisions to the Technical Reports process
- Re: Reminder: April 21 deadline for comments re revisions to the Technical Reports process
- RE: Reminder: April 21 deadline for comments re revisions to the Technical Reports process
Wednesday, 9 April 2014
- Reminder: April 21 deadline for comments re revisions to the Technical Reports process
- Re: W3C events classification
Monday, 7 April 2014
Friday, 4 April 2014
- Re: W3C needs a Dashboard
- Re: W3C needs a Dashboard
- Re: W3C needs a Dashboard
- Re: W3C needs a Dashboard
- Re: W3C events classification
- Re: W3C events classification
- Re: ISSUE-88: The events section of procdoc-2005 is arcane and needs updating
- Re: ISSUE-88: The events section of procdoc-2005 is arcane and needs updating
Thursday, 3 April 2014
- RE: W3C events classification
- Re: W3C events classification
- ISSUE-92: What is the process and requirements for an external organization to seek the consortium's brand for their event?
- ISSUE-91: Should the consortium use community tools (such as an external organization like http://lanyrd.com/dashboard/) for event management?
- ISSUE-90: What is the process and criteria for determining requests for w3c branding for relevant events hosted by external organizations?
- ISSUE-89: Should the w3c create a centralized curated calendar of its events including relevant external events?
- ISSUE-88: The events section of procdoc-2005 is arcane and needs updating