- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 12:32:53 -0400
- To: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>, ian jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- CC: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 4/4/14 4:20 AM, ext GALINDO Virginie wrote:
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Dashboard
FYI, I added a new section re Priorities because ...
On 4/3/14 1:31 PM, ext Ian Jacobs wrote:
| [1] https://www.w3.org/wiki/Headlights2013/SiteRedesign/Proposal
That's a lot of details and a bit of a `boil the ocean` approach. (And I
presume that since we are having this discussion no active resources are
being applied to implement that proposal.)
A high priority Use Case for me (as AC rep and Chair) is to have a
single doc/service that provides a link to all Working Groups'
{roadmap,dashboard,PubStatus,<what_ever_groups_call_it>} if they have
one. As I said back in 2012 [1], a low-hanging-fruit solution would be
to simply include such links to a canonical list of Working Groups such
as [2], although adding the group's dashboard links to [3] would be
better than what we have now which is nothing.
-AB
[1] <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-forum/2012OctDec/0154.html>
[2] <http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/>
[3] <https://www.w3.org/Member/Mail/>
Received on Friday, 4 April 2014 16:33:39 UTC