W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > April 2014

RE: w3process-ISSUE-95 (Clarify Rec->Edited Rec): Clarify the process of moving from REC to edited REC [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

From: Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 22:58:38 +0000
To: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>, Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00789ab469c048298717a4c8d99e734e@BLUPR02MB180.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Charles, Diagram looks good to me. (One thought: change "PR" to "PR/PER" to better match text or match text to PR)

Steve Z

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles McCathie Nevile [mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 1:35 PM
> To: public-w3process@w3.org; Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue
> Tracker
> Subject: Re: w3process-ISSUE-95 (Clarify Rec->Edited Rec): Clarify the process
> of moving from REC to edited REC [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
> 
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 17:57:22 +0200, Revising W3C Process Community
> Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> > w3process-ISSUE-95 (Clarify Rec->Edited Rec): Clarify the process of
> > moving from REC to edited REC [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/95

> >
> > It is not entirely clear exactly what you have to do to produce an
> > Edited Rec. The idea is that if you don't need a technical review
> > (editorial changes only), you can go straight to Proposed Rec.
> 
> If you are making invisible changes (i.e. a broken stylesheet link, a markup fix),
> you don't even need that.
> 
> But it is unclear what happens for e.g. a reference that gets changed. I don't
> really care either way for now, so I will leave it as unclear as it has always been.
> 
> > If you made any substantive change you need a Candidate recommendation
> > review, because there is no other guarantee that you didn't in fact
> > touch on new IPR.
> >
> > There should be a flow diagram here to clarify.
> 
> I've made the diagram, and it is attached here.
> 
> Hopefully I will publish a version of the document in an hour or two with text to
> match, and I will be ready to declare it done for this revision...
> 
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
>        chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2014 22:59:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:17 UTC