- From: Jean-Charles (JC) Verdié <jicheu@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 09:36:29 +0200
- To: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- CC: public-w3process@w3.org, Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Charles McCathie Nevile wrote: > I believe this applies to chapters 2-6 and 8-12. If it doesn't apply to > the revised chapter 7 proposal, it probably will in a few years. > > And it doesn't provide anything usefully actionable. > > I propose to close this issue, in favour of more specific issues that > identify specific concrete problems. +1 to close that one and open actionable issues. JC > > (Also, if you raise an issue, please make sure to select *your* name. > (Not David Baron's, unless you are David Baron) > > cheers > > On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 16:30:10 +0200, Revising W3C Process Community Group > Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > >> ISSUE-88: The events section of procdoc-2005 is arcane and needs updating >> >> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/88 >> >> Raised by: >> On product: >> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 4 April 2014 07:37:02 UTC