- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:04:36 -0500
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
On Apr 24, 2014, at 8:59 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote: > [ Bcc: w3c-ac-forum ] > > A recent discussion about a proposal to create a new WG to continue work started by a CG raised some general questions about the process used to evaluate such proposals [1]. I created a document to capture some of the related questions and considerations [2]. > > Perhaps [something like] this can be used as the basis of a framework to create more consistent and transparent criteria when evaluation new WG proposals? I think this is also relevant information and a set of questions (this applies to each WG, not just groups of WGs): 5.6 Activity Proposals http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/activities.html#BPCreation Ian > > Comments on this doc are welcome but please send them to public-w3process and as always, please do feel free to directly update this document. > > -Thanks, AB > > [1] <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2014AprJun/0015.html> > [2] <https://www.w3.org/wiki/AdvisoryCommittee/NewWGProposals> > > > > -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Thursday, 24 April 2014 14:04:37 UTC