[Pubrules] Proposed changes regarding references to editors' drafts
Feedback from Liam Quin - Fwd: Re: Staff contacts review of draft Chapter 7 revision
ISSUE-88: The events section of procdoc-2005 is arcane and needs updating
ISSUE-89: Should the w3c create a centralized curated calendar of its events including relevant external events?
ISSUE-90: What is the process and criteria for determining requests for w3c branding for relevant events hosted by external organizations?
ISSUE-91: Should the consortium use community tools (such as an external organization like http://lanyrd.com/dashboard/) for event management?
ISSUE-92: What is the process and requirements for an external organization to seek the consortium's brand for their event?
Meeting record: 2014-04-28 Chapter 7 Task Force
New Editor's draft of Process
New Editor's draft.
Process Document Chapter 7 Task Force meeting on next Monday, 28 April
Proposal for "Community Meetup" experiment -- was RE: Summary and minutes of 4-5 March 2014 Advisory Board face-to-face meeting
Reminder: April 21 deadline for comments re revisions to the Technical Reports process
Time for Process Document Chapter 7 Task Force meeting on next Monday, 28 April
Towards consistent and transparent evaluation of new WG proposals
Update on Process Document Chapter 7 Task Force meeting on next Monday, 28 April
W3C events classification
W3C needs a Dashboard
w3process-ISSUE-93 (joint specs): What should the requirements be for specifications produced by more than one WG?
w3process-ISSUE-94 (Declined transition announcements): Who should be informed when a transition is declined, and of what? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
w3process-ISSUE-95 (Clarify Rec->Edited Rec): Clarify the process of moving from REC to edited REC [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
w3process-ISSUE-96 (Errata Pages): Should there be clear requirements on maintaining errata? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2014 23:27:54 UTC