Thursday, 31 August 2017
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- [poe] Setting a value related to the leftOperand of a constraint
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
Wednesday, 30 August 2017
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
Tuesday, 29 August 2017
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- [poe] On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing
- [poe] Issue: On 2.6.8 Rule Active State Processing marked as Editorial
- Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- Closed: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Monday, 28 August 2017
- Re: [poe] How to evaluate the results of Permission, Prohibition and Duty
- Re: [poe] How Rules become Active
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Sunday, 27 August 2017
- Re: [poe] The foggy effective/in-effect terminology
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- [poe] Issue: The foggy effective/in-effect terminology marked as Model
Saturday, 26 August 2017
Friday, 25 August 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Which property of type Duty has a consequence property?
- Re: [poe] Which property of type Duty has a consequence property?
- Re: [poe] adding disclaimer to http://www.w3.org/TR/odrl
- Re: [poe] Which property of type Duty has a consequence property?
- Re: [poe] How to evaluate the results of Permission, Prohibition and Duty
- Re: [poe] How Rules become Active
- Re: [poe] How to evaluate the results of Permission, Prohibition and Duty
- Re: [poe] How to evaluate the results of Permission, Prohibition and Duty
- Re: [poe] How to evaluate the results of Permission, Prohibition and Duty
- Re: [poe] How to evaluate the results of Permission, Prohibition and Duty
- Re: [poe] adding disclaimer to http://www.w3.org/TR/odrl
- Re: [poe] How Rules become Active
- [poe] adding disclaimer to http://www.w3.org/TR/odrl
- [poe] Issue: adding disclaimer to http://www.w3.org/TR/odrl marked as question
- Re: [poe] How Rules become Active
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Which property of type Duty has a consequence property?
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] Issue: Duty->Consequence marked as To Be Closed
- Closed: [poe] Reviews of ODRL Vocabulary ... - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- [poe] Issue: How to evaluate the results of Permission, Prohibition and Duty marked as Model
- [poe] Issue: Which property of type Duty has a consequence property? marked as Model
- [poe] Issue: How Rules become Active marked as Model
Thursday, 24 August 2017
- Re: [poe] How to evaluate the results of Permission, Prohibition and Duty
- Re: [poe] Which property of type Duty has a consequence property?
- Re: [poe] How Rules become Active
- [poe] How to evaluate the results of Permission, Prohibition and Duty
- [poe] Which property of type Duty has a consequence property?
- Re: [poe] How Rules become Active
- Re: [poe] How Rules become Active
- Re: [poe] How Rules become Active
- [poe] How Rules become Active
- Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
Wednesday, 23 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
Tuesday, 22 August 2017
- Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
Monday, 21 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- Re: [poe] Definition of ODRL
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Sunday, 20 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Definition of ODRL
- Closed: [poe] IM - simple typos
- Re: [poe] IM - simple typos
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Definition of ODRL
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Friday, 18 August 2017
- Re: [poe] wording of cardinality restrictions
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- [poe] Issue: IM - simple typos marked as Editorial
- [poe] IM - simple typos
- Re: [poe] Definition of ODRL
- Closed: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary and of Profiles
- Closed: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- Re: [poe] wording of cardinality restrictions
- Re: [poe] wording of cardinality restrictions
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] wording of cardinality restrictions
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Thursday, 17 August 2017
- Re: [poe] wording of cardinality restrictions
- Re: [poe] wording of cardinality restrictions
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] wording of cardinality restrictions
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Tuesday, 15 August 2017
- Re: [poe] wording of cardinality restrictions
- Re: [poe] wording of cardinality restrictions
- Re: [poe] wording of cardinality restrictions
- Re: [poe] wording of cardinality restrictions
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] wording of cardinality restrictions
- Re: [poe] wording of cardinality restrictions
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] wording of cardinality restrictions
- Closed: [poe] What does it mean for permissions/prohibitions/duties if their constraint(s) are (un)satisfied?
- Closed: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Editorial style
- [poe] new commits pushed by vroddon
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Definition of ODRL
- Re: [poe] Definition of ODRL
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
Monday, 14 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Definition of ODRL
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- [poe] Definition of ODRL
- [poe] Issue: Definition of ODRL marked as Editorial
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- [poe] Issue: wording of cardinality restrictions marked as Model
- [poe] wording of cardinality restrictions
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] ODRL Evaluator review - IM of 11 August 2017
- [poe] Issue: ODRL Evaluator review - IM of 11 August 2017 marked as Model
Sunday, 13 August 2017
Saturday, 12 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Closed: [poe] Auto Script Bugs
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Auto Script Bugs
Friday, 11 August 2017
- [poe] ODRL Evaluator review - IM of 11 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by simonstey
- [poe] new commits pushed by simonstey
- [poe] Issue: ambiguous semantics of duty constraints marked as To Be Closed
- [poe] Issue: Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary and of Profiles marked as To Be Closed
- Re: [poe] Auto Script Bugs
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Thursday, 10 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Auto Script Bugs
- Re: [poe] Auto Script Bugs
- Re: [poe] Auto Script Bugs
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL Vocabulary ... - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
Wednesday, 9 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- Re: [poe] Auto Script Bugs
- Re: [poe] Auto Script Bugs
- Re: [poe] Auto Script Bugs
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL Vocabulary ... - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL Vocabulary ... - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- [poe] Issue: Add reference to original ODRL requirements marked as Requirement
- [poe] Issue: Move Scenario Examples to Best Practices NOTE marked as Best Practices
- Closed: [poe] ODRL Latest Version Redirects
- Closed: [poe] Accessibility
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL Vocabulary ... - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Tuesday, 8 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] Issue: Reviews of ODRL Vocabulary ... - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017 marked as Vocab
- [poe] Issue: Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017 marked as Model
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- [poe] Issue: Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses marked as To Be Closed
- [poe] Issue: What does it mean for permissions/prohibitions/duties if their constraint(s) are (un)satisfied? marked as To Be Closed
Monday, 7 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL Vocabulary ... - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- [poe] Reviews of ODRL Vocabulary ... - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- Re: [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- [poe] Reviews of ODRL IM - Editor's Draft 3 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- Closed: [poe] Duplicates in Vocabulary
- Closed: [poe] Modelling duty/obligation
- Closed: [poe] Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements
- Closed: [poe] Constraint Narrative
- Closed: [poe] What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles?
- Closed: [poe] Model clarifications
- Closed: [poe] Possible extensions of the (SKOS) concept schemes defined in POE
- Closed: [poe] Relation to other standard frameworks for expressing rights statements
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
Thursday, 3 August 2017
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] Role of the ODRL Common Vocabulary and of Profiles
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Wednesday, 2 August 2017
- Re: [poe] Define Atomic and Compound Constraint as subclasses
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] Issue: Auto Script Bugs marked as Vocab
- Re: [poe] ambiguous semantics of duty constraints
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Closed: [poe] Can policy metadata be serialized in the XML encoding
- Re: [poe] Can policy metadata be serialized in the XML encoding
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
Tuesday, 1 August 2017
- Closed: [poe] Does the JSON-LD serialization distinguish human-readable and machine-readable strings for DC terms?
- Re: [poe] Does the JSON-LD serialization distinguish human-readable and machine-readable strings for DC terms?
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Closed: [poe] I18N Review: does Policy Metadata need Unicode normalization
- Re: [poe] I18N Review: does Policy Metadata need Unicode normalization
- Re: [poe] Duty->Consequence
- [poe] new commits pushed by riannella
- Re: [poe] What does it mean for permissions/prohibitions/duties if their constraint(s) are (un)satisfied?
- Re: [poe] ODRL Processor & Test Suite
- Closed: [poe] ODRL Processor & Test Suite
- [poe] Issue: Modelling duty/obligation marked as To Be Closed
- Re: [poe] Naming of elements/properties
- Closed: [poe] Naming of elements/properties
- Closed: [poe] Vocab clarifications
- Re: [poe] Vocab clarifications
- Re: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies
- Closed: [poe] Compatibility with common patterns for linking assets to policies
- [poe] Issue: Specifications of includedIn and implies need improvements marked as To Be Closed
- [poe] Issue: Constraint Narrative marked as To Be Closed
- [poe] Issue: Duplicates in Vocabulary marked as To Be Closed
- [poe] Issue: What's the immutable core of ODRL that cannot be changed by Profiles? marked as To Be Closed
- Closed: [poe] XML Schema design
- Closed: [poe] Range of RightOperand
- Closed: [poe] Use of cardinality restrictions in the ontology?
- Closed: [poe] Remove inheritAllowed functionality & single inheritance restriction
- Closed: [poe] IM: upgrade Short-cut Instances of Classes in Policy Rule Composition to a section