- From: Renato Iannella via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 01:05:10 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
> Wording note: some definitions use for a cardinality including "..unbounded" the words "have none, one, or more" others " have one and MAY have many". I see no difference in the formal expression, could the wording be harmonised to "have none, one, or more" and "have one, or more". We use the the RFC terms (MAY, MUST) in these expressions. So, it is "MUST have one and MAY have many..." which means that the property must appear at least once. I assume we must keep using the RFC terms as a W3C spec. -- GitHub Notification of comment by riannella Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/215#issuecomment-321421903 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2017 01:05:11 UTC