- From: Michael Steidl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 21:31:14 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
I've created a draft of guidelines for evaluating if a Permission, Prohibition or Duty is Active or Not-Active: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vej4EwEZjUM2yYJwBggJxHlSTCinyuMPCulKIeHNTA0/edit?usp=sharing ... in the upper section of the table. The key specification in the IM for these guidelines is the definition mentioned above. These guidelines build on "applicable" Duty = Active Duty in the duty(ies), remedy(-ies) and Duty's consequence(s) columns. If a Duty is fulfilled or not is by my understanding an inconsistent requirement: * For the Not-/Active evaluation of a Rule the action of the Rule is not relevant * For the Not-/Active evaluation of a Duty - which is a sub-class of Rule - the action is suddenly relevant. And if the action of a Duty is taken is highly relevant of Fulfilled or Not-Fulfilled. * Therefore these guidelines evaluate if a related Duty is Active or not - this is consistent. -- GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/221#issuecomment-324763276 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 24 August 2017 21:31:12 UTC