- From: Michael Steidl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 07:39:52 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
Re my concerns regarding "Duty must be fulfilled" to make the Rule including it Active A/ What is the role of Not-/Active in the evaluation of a Rule * The IM of 21 August outlines that "in effect" is needed by an ODRL Evaluator, but chapter 3 is currently "under construction" ... * ... the shown "old" version told "Where no rules are in effect, the policy is effectively silent on what actions may or may not be performed." ... * ... in other words: if a rule is Not-Active it is (= has to be) ignored by the Evaluator. As I recollect discussion this is shared by the WG persons. B/ At what point(s) of the evaluation of a Rule does it make sense to set the state Not-/Active * The evaluation of a Rule in compliance with ODRL could be done without having such a state, so a practical use is linked to setting this state * This practical use appears to be: the receiver applies a specific use context to a received Policy, the context defines the id of the assignee, the id of an (collection of) asset(s), an action and possibly more ... * ... for this case it is of practical help to sort out the Rules of a Policy which match this context. -- GitHub Notification of comment by nitmws Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/221#issuecomment-324847034 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 25 August 2017 07:39:49 UTC