Re: [poe] wording of cardinality restrictions

Excellent!
Some of the properties were missing in the previous version, like inheritFrom. 

Having a systematic (but not fully complete, e.g. "target" is not there) vision of the model is great, but perhaps additional simplified figures can be made.

If I closed my eyes and I imaged I knew nothing about ODRL, I only would wonder about the terms "relation" and "function" (much interchangeable words which are rather unspecific). Instead, I would like to see "target" and "assigner / assignee". Also, in such a didactic-figure, I would use colours, much like in ODRL1.1. Thus, every "constraint-related" might have one colour, rule&subclasses another colour and so on.




-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by vroddon
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/218#issuecomment-323128260 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 17 August 2017 16:41:24 UTC