- Re: [patwg-charter] jrosewell: voting (#12) ekr via GitHub (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) James Rosewell via GitHub (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) Robin Berjon via GitHub (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) James Rosewell via GitHub (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) ekr via GitHub (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) Robin Berjon via GitHub (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) James Rosewell via GitHub (Wednesday, 30 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Thursday, 31 March)
- Closed: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Thursday, 31 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) ekr via GitHub (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) Lukasz Wlodarczyk via GitHub (Tuesday, 22 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) Martin Thomson via GitHub (Tuesday, 22 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) bedfordsean via GitHub (Tuesday, 22 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) James Rosewell via GitHub (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) Don Marti via GitHub (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) ekr via GitHub (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) James Rosewell via GitHub (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) ekr via GitHub (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) James Aylett via GitHub (Wednesday, 30 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) James Rosewell via GitHub (Wednesday, 30 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) Alex Cone via GitHub (Wednesday, 30 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) James Rosewell via GitHub (Wednesday, 30 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) Alex Cone via GitHub (Wednesday, 30 March)
- Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) James Rosewell via GitHub (Thursday, 31 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) marianapr via GitHub (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Alex Cone via GitHub (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Raimundo Mirisola via GitHub (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Robin Berjon via GitHub (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) marianapr via GitHub (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Andrew Knox via GitHub (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Andras Slemmer via GitHub (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) betuldurak via GitHub (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) marianapr via GitHub (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) betuldurak via GitHub (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub (Thursday, 31 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub (Thursday, 31 March)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Thursday, 31 March)
- Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Robin Berjon via GitHub (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Andrew Pascoe via GitHub (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) ekr via GitHub (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Chris Wilson via GitHub (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) ekr via GitHub (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Martin Thomson via GitHub (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Martin Thomson via GitHub (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Chris Wilson via GitHub (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) ekr via GitHub (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Wednesday, 30 March)
- Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Thursday, 31 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Monday, 7 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Josh Karlin via GitHub (Monday, 7 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub (Monday, 7 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Martin Thomson via GitHub (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Michael Kleber via GitHub (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Don Marti via GitHub (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Robin Berjon via GitHub (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Brian May via GitHub (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Michael Kleber via GitHub (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Brian May via GitHub (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Alex Cone via GitHub (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Martin Thomson via GitHub (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Braedon Vickers via GitHub (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Robin Berjon via GitHub (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Don Marti via GitHub (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Brian May via GitHub (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Don Marti via GitHub (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Wendy Seltzer via GitHub (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Michael Kleber via GitHub (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Don Marti via GitHub (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) BasileLeparmentier via GitHub (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Alex Cone via GitHub (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Martin Thomson via GitHub (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) BasileLeparmentier via GitHub (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Alex Cone via GitHub (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub (Thursday, 3 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) jeffjaffe via GitHub (Thursday, 3 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub (Thursday, 3 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub (Thursday, 3 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) nlongcn via GitHub (Thursday, 3 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) ansuz via GitHub (Friday, 4 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub (Friday, 4 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Lionel Basdevant via GitHub (Monday, 7 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Paul Farrow via GitHub (Monday, 7 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub (Monday, 7 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Alex Cone via GitHub (Monday, 7 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) kirangopinath71 via GitHub (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Don Marti via GitHub (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Alex Cone via GitHub (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Alex Cone via GitHub (Monday, 14 March)
Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2022 23:53:25 UTC