public-patcg@w3.org from March 2022 by author

Alex Cone via GitHub

Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Wednesday, 30 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Wednesday, 30 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Ben Savage: Need to define Privacy (#6) (Wednesday, 23 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Tuesday, 15 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Monday, 14 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Monday, 14 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Thursday, 10 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Monday, 7 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Wednesday, 2 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Tuesday, 1 March)

Andras Slemmer via GitHub

Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Thursday, 24 March)

Andrew Knox via GitHub

Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Thursday, 24 March)

Andrew Pascoe via GitHub

Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) (Tuesday, 15 March)

ansuz via GitHub

Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Friday, 4 March)

Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub

[meetings] Update on Privacy Principles? (#43) (Thursday, 31 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Thursday, 31 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) (Thursday, 31 March)
[admin] Pull Request: Create space to record w3c-external stakeholders (Thursday, 31 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] Define a way for the CG to perform community-focused tasks on behalf of the WG (#12) (Thursday, 31 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) (Thursday, 31 March)
[patcg.github.io] Pull Request: Define a way for the CG to perform community-focused tasks on behalf of the WG (Thursday, 31 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) (Thursday, 31 March)
Closed: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) (Thursday, 31 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) (Thursday, 31 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) (Thursday, 31 March)
Re: [meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34) (Thursday, 31 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) (Wednesday, 30 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] What does due process mean (#11) (Wednesday, 30 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) (Wednesday, 30 March)
Re: [meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Tuesday, 29 March)
[meetings] Agenda Request - Call for Progress Report on Private Measurement (#42) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "web features" -> "solutions" (#5) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Ben Savage: Need to define Privacy (#6) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "across multiple devices and browsers" (#7) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Where do we propose to advance to, CR or PR? (#9) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: Do not reference S&P questionnaire (#10) (Tuesday, 29 March)
[patwg-charter] Pull Request: Adding link to Decisions section of Process document (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) (Tuesday, 29 March)
[patwg-charter] Pull Request: Community stakeholder feedback collection process (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Joshua Koran: Broader CfC (#13) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Ben Savage: Need to define Privacy (#6) (Wednesday, 23 March)
Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) (Monday, 21 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Call for Consensus on Charter Issue: "chair selection is complex and open to abuse" (#41) (Monday, 21 March)
[meetings] Agenda Request - Call for Consensus on Charter Issue: "chair selection is complex and open to abuse" (#41) (Monday, 21 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] briefer chair selection: by consensus (#10) (Friday, 18 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Collective Governance of Infrastructure (#40) (Friday, 18 March)
Re: [meetings] Review Charter Changes (#36) (Friday, 18 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] chairs don't immediately vacate upon election (#9) (Friday, 18 March)
Re: [meetings] Refine and finalize Agenda (#37) (Wednesday, 16 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Wednesday, 16 March)
Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) (Wednesday, 16 March)
[meetings] Pull Request: Correcting readme to reflect current meeting mode (Tuesday, 15 March)
[proposals] new commits pushed by AramZS (Tuesday, 15 March)
[proposals] Merged Pull Request: README tweak to refer to PATCG (Tuesday, 15 March)
[patwg-charter] Document Editors should have Full Access to this repo (#2) (Tuesday, 15 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Consider the Reach and Frequency Use Case for Ads Measurement (#12) (Tuesday, 15 March)
Closed: [meetings] January 2022 Meeting (#5) (Tuesday, 15 March)
[meetings] Merged Pull Request: README tweak to refer to PATCG. (Tuesday, 15 March)
Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) (Tuesday, 15 March)
[docs-and-reports] Merged Pull Request: README tweak to refer to PATCG and add link to CEPC. (Tuesday, 15 March)
Closed: [meetings] Have a day free between meetings. (#15) (Tuesday, 15 March)
Re: [meetings] Have a day free between meetings. (#15) (Tuesday, 15 March)
Closed: [meetings] Publish agenda in advance with links to relevant information. (#13) (Tuesday, 15 March)
[meetings] Refine and finalize Agenda (#37) (Tuesday, 15 March)
Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) (Tuesday, 15 March)
Closed: [patwg-charter] Stand by while we add this repo to the email list. (#1) (Tuesday, 15 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Stand by while we add this repo to the email list. (#1) (Tuesday, 15 March)
[meetings] Review Charter Changes (#36) (Tuesday, 15 March)
Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) (Tuesday, 15 March)
[patcg.github.io] Merged Pull Request: Updating Annoucments related text (Tuesday, 15 March)
Closed: [patcg.github.io] notify the group via the mailing list (#2) (Tuesday, 15 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] Updating Annoucments related text (#8) (Tuesday, 15 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) (Tuesday, 15 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) (Monday, 14 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Monday, 14 March)
[patcg.github.io] Pull Request: Adding a clear incubation process and flow (Monday, 14 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Monday, 14 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] clarify charter scope (#6) (Monday, 14 March)
Closed: [docs-and-reports] This repository is not in the W3C's email system yet. (#2) (Friday, 11 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Friday, 11 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Friday, 11 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Friday, 11 March)
Re: [docs-and-reports] This repository is not in the W3C's email system yet. (#2) (Thursday, 10 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Monday, 7 March)
[proposals] new commits pushed by AramZS (Monday, 7 March)
[proposals] new commits pushed by AramZS (Monday, 7 March)
[proposals] new commits pushed by AramZS (Monday, 7 March)
Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) (Monday, 7 March)
[meetings] Merged Pull Request: First pass at minutes (Monday, 7 March)

BasileLeparmentier via GitHub

Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Wednesday, 2 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Tuesday, 1 March)

bedfordsean via GitHub

Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Tuesday, 22 March)

betuldurak via GitHub

Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Monday, 28 March)

Brad Lassey via GitHub

Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) (Tuesday, 29 March)

Braedon Vickers via GitHub

Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Friday, 11 March)

Brian May via GitHub

Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Friday, 11 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Thursday, 10 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Thursday, 10 March)

Chris Wilson via GitHub

Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) (Monday, 21 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) (Tuesday, 15 March)

Don Marti via GitHub

Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Monday, 21 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Friday, 11 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Friday, 11 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Friday, 11 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Thursday, 10 March)

ekr via GitHub

Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Charter proposal. Fixes #3 (#4) (Monday, 21 March)
[patwg-charter] Josua Koran: Broader CfC (#13) (Monday, 21 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jrosewell: voting (#12) (Monday, 21 March)
[patwg-charter] jrosewell: voting (#12) (Monday, 21 March)
[patwg-charter] What does due process mean (#11) (Monday, 21 March)
[patwg-charter] jrosewell: Do not reference S&P questionnaire (#10) (Monday, 21 March)
[patwg-charter] Where do we propose to advance to, CR or PR? (#9) (Monday, 21 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Monday, 21 March)
[patwg-charter] jrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Monday, 21 March)
[patwg-charter] jrosewell: "across multiple devices and browsers" (#7) (Monday, 21 March)
[patwg-charter] Need to define Privacy (#6) (Monday, 21 March)
[patwg-charter] jrosewell: "web features" -> "solutions" (#5) (Monday, 21 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) (Monday, 21 March)
Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) (Monday, 21 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Charter proposal. Fixes #3 (#4) (Thursday, 17 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Charter proposal. Fixes #3 (#4) (Thursday, 17 March)
[patwg-charter] Pull Request: Charter proposal. Fixes #3 (Thursday, 17 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) (Tuesday, 15 March)
[patwg-charter] Proposed PATWG Charter (#3) (Tuesday, 15 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) (Tuesday, 15 March)
Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) (Friday, 4 March)
Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) (Thursday, 3 March)

Erik Taubeneck via GitHub

Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Thursday, 31 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Thursday, 31 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Monday, 28 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Wednesday, 23 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Thursday, 17 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Thursday, 17 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] chair selection is complex and open to abuse (#1) (Wednesday, 16 March)
[meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on technologies used to enable privacy? (#39) (Tuesday, 15 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Thursday, 10 March)
[private-measurement] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#9) (Monday, 7 March)

James Aylett via GitHub

Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Wednesday, 30 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "across multiple devices and browsers" (#7) (Tuesday, 22 March)

James Rosewell via GitHub

Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Thursday, 31 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) (Wednesday, 30 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Wednesday, 30 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Wednesday, 30 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Ben Savage: Need to define Privacy (#6) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "web features" -> "solutions" (#5) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: Do not reference S&P questionnaire (#10) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Ben Savage: Need to define Privacy (#6) (Thursday, 24 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "across multiple devices and browsers" (#7) (Wednesday, 23 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "web features" -> "solutions" (#5) (Wednesday, 23 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Ben Savage: Need to define Privacy (#6) (Wednesday, 23 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Wednesday, 23 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) (Wednesday, 23 March)
Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) (Thursday, 17 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Charter proposal. Fixes #3 (#4) (Thursday, 17 March)
Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) (Wednesday, 16 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Monday, 14 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Monday, 14 March)
Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) (Monday, 7 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Thursday, 3 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Thursday, 3 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Tuesday, 1 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Tuesday, 1 March)

jeffjaffe via GitHub

Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Thursday, 3 March)

Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub

Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Monday, 7 March)

Josh Karlin via GitHub

Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Monday, 7 March)
Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) (Thursday, 3 March)

joshuakoran via GitHub

Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) (Wednesday, 30 March)

Kiran Gopinath

Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Wednesday, 2 March)

kirangopinath71 via GitHub

Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Friday, 11 March)

Lionel Basdevant via GitHub

Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Monday, 7 March)

Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub

Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Friday, 4 March)

Lukasz Wlodarczyk via GitHub

Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Tuesday, 22 March)

marianapr via GitHub

Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Monday, 28 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Wednesday, 23 March)
Re: [meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34) (Friday, 18 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Tuesday, 15 March)
Re: [meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34) (Monday, 7 March)

Martin Thomson via GitHub

Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) (Tuesday, 22 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] What does due process mean (#11) (Tuesday, 22 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] briefer chair selection: by consensus (#10) (Monday, 21 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) (Monday, 21 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) (Wednesday, 16 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Friday, 11 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Tuesday, 8 March)
Closed: [admin] Review and improve security/privacy disclosure policy (#1) (Tuesday, 8 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Wednesday, 2 March)

Michael Kleber via GitHub

Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Monday, 14 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Thursday, 10 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Thursday, 10 March)

Nick Doty via GitHub

Re: [patcg.github.io] briefer chair selection: by consensus (#10) (Monday, 21 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] briefer chair selection: by consensus (#10) (Friday, 18 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] chair selection is complex and open to abuse (#1) (Friday, 18 March)
[patcg.github.io] Pull Request: briefer chair selection: by consensus (Friday, 18 March)
[patcg.github.io] Pull Request: chairs don't immediately vacate upon election (Thursday, 17 March)

nlongcn via GitHub

Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Thursday, 3 March)

Paul Farrow via GitHub

Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Monday, 7 March)

Raimundo Mirisola via GitHub

Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Tuesday, 15 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Consider the Reach and Frequency Use Case for Ads Measurement (#12) (Tuesday, 15 March)

Robin Berjon via GitHub

Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) (Thursday, 31 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Ben Savage: Need to define Privacy (#6) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) (Tuesday, 29 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: Do not reference S&P questionnaire (#10) (Monday, 28 March)
Re: [patwg-charter] Ben Savage: Need to define Privacy (#6) (Monday, 28 March)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) (Thursday, 17 March)
[meetings] Agenda Request - Collective Governance of Infrastructure (#40) (Thursday, 17 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) (Monday, 14 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Friday, 11 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Thursday, 10 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Monday, 7 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Thursday, 3 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Wednesday, 2 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Tuesday, 1 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Tuesday, 1 March)
Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) (Tuesday, 1 March)

Sean Turner via GitHub

Re: [meetings] Review Charter Changes (#36) (Monday, 28 March)
[patcg.github.io] Pull Request: More text for deliverables (Monday, 28 March)
Re: [admin] Meeting: 5th & 7th April 2022 (#4) (Monday, 28 March)
[meetings] Merged Pull Request: Correcting readme to reflect current meeting mode (Monday, 21 March)
Closed: [patwg-charter] Proposed PATWG Charter (#3) (Monday, 21 March)
[patwg-charter] Merged Pull Request: Charter proposal. Fixes #3 (Monday, 21 March)
Re: [meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34) (Thursday, 17 March)
[admin] Meeting: 5th & 7th April 2022 (#4) (Thursday, 17 March)
Re: [meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34) (Thursday, 17 March)
Re: [admin] Proposed PATWG Charter (#3) (Tuesday, 15 March)
[docs-and-reports] Pull Request: README tweak to refer to PATCG and add link to CEPC. (Tuesday, 15 March)
[proposals] Pull Request: README tweak to refer to PATCG (Tuesday, 15 March)
[meetings] Pull Request: README tweak to refer to PATCG. (Tuesday, 15 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] chair selection is complex and open to abuse (#1) (Tuesday, 15 March)
[patcg.github.io] Pull Request: Updating Annoucments related text (Monday, 14 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Monday, 7 March)
Re: [meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34) (Monday, 7 March)
Re: [admin] Proposed PATWG Charter (#3) (Friday, 4 March)
Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) (Friday, 4 March)
Re: [meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34) (Friday, 4 March)
Re: [patcg.github.io] chair selection is complex and open to abuse (#1) (Thursday, 3 March)

W3C Calendar

Event Invitation: Private Advertising Technology CG Meeting (Monday, 28 March)

Wendy Seltzer via GitHub

Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) (Thursday, 17 March)
Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) (Friday, 11 March)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2022 23:53:25 UTC