- From: Robin Berjon via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 19:08:02 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
@jwrosewell A lot of things are used and yet don't work, consent is one of them. See copious prior work. I can't imagine that this group will prevent anyone from using consent in the most reasonable ways, when those exist. There is however no known way to share a significant portion of cross-context reading history with a party, at scale, based on consent, and so the reasonable application of consent for this group is to not rely on it. I'm glad that you agree with this. (Is it annoying when people claim that you agree with them when they know you don't? Maybe you should consider not doing that to others.) I'm not sure what to make of the handful of potential properties of consent that you list. Is it your expectation that no one has thought of this before? Is there a specific problem in the space, based on your reading of prior art, that you believe you are bringing a novel solution to? -- GitHub Notification of comment by darobin Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/proposals/issues/5#issuecomment-1055766315 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2022 19:08:04 UTC