public-patcg@w3.org from March 2022 by date

Thursday, 31 March 2022

• [meetings] Update on Privacy Principles? (#43) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [admin] Pull Request: Create space to record w3c-external stakeholders Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] Define a way for the CG to perform community-focused tasks on behalf of the WG (#12) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• [patcg.github.io] Pull Request: Define a way for the CG to perform community-focused tasks on behalf of the WG Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub

Wednesday, 30 March 2022

• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) joshuakoran via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] What does due process mean (#11) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) James Aylett via GitHub

Tuesday, 29 March 2022

• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) Brad Lassey via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Ben Savage: Need to define Privacy (#6) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Ben Savage: Need to define Privacy (#6) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "web features" -> "solutions" (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Community stakeholder feedback collection process (#14) Brad Lassey via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Agenda Request - Call for Progress Report on Private Measurement (#42) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "web features" -> "solutions" (#5) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) Don Marti via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Ben Savage: Need to define Privacy (#6) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "across multiple devices and browsers" (#7) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Where do we propose to advance to, CR or PR? (#9) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: Do not reference S&P questionnaire (#10) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Pull Request: Adding link to Decisions section of Process document Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Pull Request: Community stakeholder feedback collection process Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) betuldurak via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Joshua Koran: Broader CfC (#13) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: Do not reference S&P questionnaire (#10) James Rosewell via GitHub

Monday, 28 March 2022

• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) marianapr via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: Do not reference S&P questionnaire (#10) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Ben Savage: Need to define Privacy (#6) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Review Charter Changes (#36) Sean Turner via GitHub
• [patcg.github.io] Pull Request: More text for deliverables Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [admin] Meeting: 5th & 7th April 2022 (#4) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Event Invitation: Private Advertising Technology CG Meeting W3C Calendar
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) betuldurak via GitHub

Thursday, 24 March 2022

• Re: [patwg-charter] Ben Savage: Need to define Privacy (#6) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Andras Slemmer via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Andrew Knox via GitHub

Wednesday, 23 March 2022

• Re: [patwg-charter] Ben Savage: Need to define Privacy (#6) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Ben Savage: Need to define Privacy (#6) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "across multiple devices and browsers" (#7) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "web features" -> "solutions" (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Ben Savage: Need to define Privacy (#6) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: voting (#12) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) marianapr via GitHub

Tuesday, 22 March 2022

• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "across multiple devices and browsers" (#7) James Aylett via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) bedfordsean via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) Lukasz Wlodarczyk via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] What does due process mean (#11) Martin Thomson via GitHub

Monday, 21 March 2022

• Re: [patwg-charter] Charter proposal. Fixes #3 (#4) ekr via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Josua Koran: Broader CfC (#13) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jrosewell: voting (#12) ekr via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] jrosewell: voting (#12) ekr via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] What does due process mean (#11) ekr via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] jrosewell: Do not reference S&P questionnaire (#10) ekr via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Where do we propose to advance to, CR or PR? (#9) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] jrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) ekr via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] jrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8) ekr via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] jrosewell: "across multiple devices and browsers" (#7) ekr via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Need to define Privacy (#6) ekr via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] jrosewell: "web features" -> "solutions" (#5) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Don Marti via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Chris Wilson via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) ekr via GitHub
• [meetings] Merged Pull Request: Correcting readme to reflect current meeting mode Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [patwg-charter] Proposed PATWG Charter (#3) Sean Turner via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Merged Pull Request: Charter proposal. Fixes #3 Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Call for Consensus on Charter Issue: "chair selection is complex and open to abuse" (#41) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Agenda Request - Call for Consensus on Charter Issue: "chair selection is complex and open to abuse" (#41) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] briefer chair selection: by consensus (#10) Nick Doty via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] briefer chair selection: by consensus (#10) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Martin Thomson via GitHub

Friday, 18 March 2022

• Re: [patcg.github.io] briefer chair selection: by consensus (#10) Nick Doty via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34) marianapr via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] briefer chair selection: by consensus (#10) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Collective Governance of Infrastructure (#40) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Review Charter Changes (#36) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] chairs don't immediately vacate upon election (#9) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] chair selection is complex and open to abuse (#1) Nick Doty via GitHub
• [patcg.github.io] Pull Request: briefer chair selection: by consensus Nick Doty via GitHub

Thursday, 17 March 2022

• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• [patcg.github.io] Pull Request: chairs don't immediately vacate upon election Nick Doty via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• [meetings] Agenda Request - Collective Governance of Infrastructure (#40) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) Wendy Seltzer via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Charter proposal. Fixes #3 (#4) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Charter proposal. Fixes #3 (#4) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34) Sean Turner via GitHub
• [admin] Meeting: 5th & 7th April 2022 (#4) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Charter proposal. Fixes #3 (#4) ekr via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Pull Request: Charter proposal. Fixes #3 ekr via GitHub

Wednesday, 16 March 2022

• Re: [patcg.github.io] chair selection is complex and open to abuse (#1) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Refine and finalize Agenda (#37) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) James Rosewell via GitHub

Tuesday, 15 March 2022

• Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Chris Wilson via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Raimundo Mirisola via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on which technologies are used to enable privacy? (#39) marianapr via GitHub
• [meetings] Agenda Request - Should PATCG be opinionated on technologies used to enable privacy? (#39) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Proposed PATWG Charter (#3) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [admin] Proposed PATWG Charter (#3) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Consider the Reach and Frequency Use Case for Ads Measurement (#12) Raimundo Mirisola via GitHub
• [meetings] Pull Request: Correcting readme to reflect current meeting mode Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) ekr via GitHub
• [proposals] new commits pushed by AramZS Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [proposals] Merged Pull Request: README tweak to refer to PATCG Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [patwg-charter] Document Editors should have Full Access to this repo (#2) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Consider the Reach and Frequency Use Case for Ads Measurement (#12) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] January 2022 Meeting (#5) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Merged Pull Request: README tweak to refer to PATCG. Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Privacy Principles for Web Advertising Features - Editorial Group (#18) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [docs-and-reports] Merged Pull Request: README tweak to refer to PATCG and add link to CEPC. Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Have a day free between meetings. (#15) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Have a day free between meetings. (#15) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [meetings] Publish agenda in advance with links to relevant information. (#13) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Refine and finalize Agenda (#37) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [patwg-charter] Stand by while we add this repo to the email list. (#1) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patwg-charter] Stand by while we add this repo to the email list. (#1) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [meetings] Review Charter Changes (#36) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Andrew Pascoe via GitHub
• [patcg.github.io] Merged Pull Request: Updating Annoucments related text Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Closed: [patcg.github.io] notify the group via the mailing list (#2) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] Updating Annoucments related text (#8) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [docs-and-reports] Pull Request: README tweak to refer to PATCG and add link to CEPC. Sean Turner via GitHub
• [proposals] Pull Request: README tweak to refer to PATCG Sean Turner via GitHub
• [meetings] Pull Request: README tweak to refer to PATCG. Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] chair selection is complex and open to abuse (#1) Sean Turner via GitHub

Monday, 14 March 2022

• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] Adding a clear incubation process and flow (#7) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Michael Kleber via GitHub
• [patcg.github.io] Pull Request: Updating Annoucments related text Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [patcg.github.io] Pull Request: Adding a clear incubation process and flow Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] clarify charter scope (#6) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub

Friday, 11 March 2022

• Closed: [docs-and-reports] This repository is not in the W3C's email system yet. (#2) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Wendy Seltzer via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Don Marti via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Don Marti via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Brian May via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) kirangopinath71 via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Don Marti via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Braedon Vickers via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Martin Thomson via GitHub

Thursday, 10 March 2022

• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Brian May via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Michael Kleber via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Brian May via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Don Marti via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Michael Kleber via GitHub
• Re: [docs-and-reports] This repository is not in the W3C's email system yet. (#2) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub

Tuesday, 8 March 2022

• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Martin Thomson via GitHub
• Closed: [admin] Review and improve security/privacy disclosure policy (#1) Martin Thomson via GitHub

Monday, 7 March 2022

• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Josh Karlin via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interest Based Advertising with the Topics API (#4) Sean Turner via GitHub
• [proposals] new commits pushed by AramZS Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [proposals] new commits pushed by AramZS Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [proposals] new commits pushed by AramZS Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• [private-measurement] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#9) Erik Taubeneck via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Interoperable Private Attribution (IPA) (#2) Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34) marianapr via GitHub
• [meetings] Merged Pull Request: First pass at minutes Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Paul Farrow via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Lionel Basdevant via GitHub

Friday, 4 March 2022

• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Lukasz Olejnik via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) ansuz via GitHub
• Re: [admin] Proposed PATWG Charter (#3) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] April 2022 Meeting (#34) Sean Turner via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Chartering the Working Group (#7) ekr via GitHub

Thursday, 3 March 2022

• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) nlongcn via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) ekr via GitHub
• Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32) Josh Karlin via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) jeffjaffe via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [patcg.github.io] chair selection is complex and open to abuse (#1) Sean Turner via GitHub

Wednesday, 2 March 2022

• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) BasileLeparmentier via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Kiran Gopinath
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Martin Thomson via GitHub

Tuesday, 1 March 2022

• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Alex Cone via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) BasileLeparmentier via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) Robin Berjon via GitHub
• Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5) James Rosewell via GitHub

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2022 23:53:25 UTC