- From: Robin Berjon via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 22:41:46 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
One thing that should be clarified here is that even if those groups were to stop mentioning the Security & Privacy questionnaire in their charters, they would _still_ be under Wide Review obligations that include… the Security & Privacy questionnaire. It's mentioned for clarity, but it's required by the TAG anyway. Another thing that is worth mentioning is that in every case we have one single member/individual pushing the same objection over and over again and entire groups comprised of dozens of members and people who have consensus to keep the questionnaire. So the obvious conclusion to draw from the FOs is that the questionnaire is very popular in the Membership (and for good reason — it codifies important knowledge built by a broad community from many different backgrounds). -- GitHub Notification of comment by darobin Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/patwg-charter/issues/10#issuecomment-1081223710 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 28 March 2022 22:41:48 UTC