Re: [patwg-charter] jwrosewell: "primarily non-technical" -> "do not have any technical component" (#8)

> If the group is intending to develop a specific proposal like IPA as a technical standard then I can understand why the change I propose would be resisted by engineers.

From my perspective, yes, this is what we are intending to do (though of course, maybe not IPA and probably multiple proposals). Fundamentally, what W3C groups are good at is publishing technical specifications. These have to of course be informed by market and legal realities, but in my experience straying too far out of specifying technical behavior does not work out well (see, for instance, DNT).


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by ekr
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/patwg-charter/issues/8#issuecomment-1082333901 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2022 21:54:06 UTC