Re: [meetings] Taking up Topics API for Next Meeting or Future Meeting? (#32)

@AramZS I agree that this is not a matter for PATCG chairs to decide on. The comment was directed towards Google's representatives @cwilso and @jkarlin to request that they assure other participants they have approval from the CMA to advance the proposal as drafted. Without such an assurance they will merely be wasting everyone's time and I hope you will agree that this is not an efficient use of people's time.

As PATCG chair you may wish to determine if W3C legal advice has changed since 1st February 2022 following the publication of the commitments.

For the avoidance of doubt I believe the proposal can easily be modified so that any party can have access to the input data and then decide if they wish to implement the Topics proposal, or any other proposal using that input data. Without such a modification all I can do is noisily complain and highlight the issue.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by jwrosewell
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/meetings/issues/32#issuecomment-1071057964 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 17 March 2022 16:34:01 UTC