- From: Alex Cone via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 21:52:44 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
I'm pro consolidation to PATCG (ala @darobin) and pro prioritization of things likely to get multiple implementers (ala @martinthomson, @benjaminsavage, etc). Given that Chrome seems to be moving forward whether there are other implementers of its proposals are not, I think we should weigh that in our considerations of what gets focus and when. A few general notes on Topics that I think have people hesitant to prioritize for standards outside of Chrome: - it has the appearance, whether fair or not, of the browser taking on, proactively, the role typically most associated with a data marketplace (whereas facilitating measurement and arbitrary interest groups by practitioners sits a bit different) - It disrupts some browsers' business models so there's likely to remain an unsupportive element there. - it feels more experimental than attribution measurement or interest groups defined by practitioners. Where as the latter _must_ work, Topics can get by with working here and there as an advertiser wants to test a Topic in their overall mix -- GitHub Notification of comment by alextcone Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/proposals/issues/4#issuecomment-1064538933 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2022 21:52:45 UTC