- From: Robin Berjon via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:17:44 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
I'm all for making things more accessible, but I think this PR goes farther than is warranted. We can presume that a party that has any real ability to read a standard and produce feedback will at the very least be able to use a computer. Building out surveys and collating them is work that the group will not have bandwidth for. Instead, interested parties can send free form email feedback in reaction to significant changes. All the group needs to commit to is that significant changes are publicised. Tying this to CR or to transitions will slow things down and not necessarily intervene at the right moment. CR might intervene a long time after a decision is made, at which point a lot else might rely on it and entrench it. Instead, it would be more effective and less bureaucratic to have the group push out significant changes when they happen (when resolved). A good channel for that would be a Twitter account. This would enable more distant parties to offer feedback at the right time and tactically about the specific point they care about. -- GitHub Notification of comment by darobin Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/patwg-charter/pull/14#issuecomment-1084375292 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 31 March 2022 10:17:45 UTC