Re: [proposals] Why would notice and consent not be adequate? (Notice and consent debate) (#5)

I assume the charter can be rewritten to make the position regarding alignment to GDPR clear. I believe there is benefit in that at least.

Regarding @martinthomson statement.


> As far as the point of deeper disagreement, I don't see evidence of agreement regarding the sufficiency aspect. That is, I don't see any evidence that N&C might be sufficient basis for privacy protection. Wading through the rhetoric here, I'm only seeing one person who might be asserting that N&C is sufficient.

@darobin and @BasileLeparmentier have raised concerns about contributions. We can assume they act in good faith and there are people and organisations that have not contributed to this debate. To draw the conclusion Martin does is premature as it does not considered the input of those that do not contribute to public debate. It was for these reasons I raised this now closed issue concerning [secret ballot](https://github.com/patcg/meetings/issues/26) and @jeffjaffe (W3C CEO) raised this issue concerning [anonymous Formal Objection](https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/497). @jeffjaffe has also agreed that where new members join and do not agree with prior consensus there is no longer consensus. Therefore, how do we assess the views of the group so that these fears do not result in a vocal minority steering the group down a path that others do not agree with? This is particularly important concerning a matter that seeks to steer the group down a route that embraces a singular type of solution and as such risks limiting innovation that might otherwise result in a better solution for society and people.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by jwrosewell
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/proposals/issues/5#issuecomment-1057814036 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 3 March 2022 08:51:09 UTC