Tuesday, 25 June 2013
Monday, 24 June 2013
Thursday, 20 June 2013
- Chairs' review: Status and next steps
- [Bug 21967] Clarify enabled state for new MediaStreamTrack's
- Re: Image Capture Proposal, fifth version
- Re: Image Capture Proposal, fifth version
Tuesday, 18 June 2013
- Draft minutes 05 Jun 2013
- Re: [Bug 22212] New: Initial value of the enabled attribute on MediaStreamTrack
- [Bug 22209] "each key MUST be a valid registered constraint name in the IANA-hosted RTCWeb Media Constraints registry"
- Re: [Bug 22212] New: Initial value of the enabled attribute on MediaStreamTrack
- Re: MediaStream ended vs inactive
Monday, 17 June 2013
- Re: [Bug 22338] New: Arbitrary changing of tracks
- Re: [Bug 22338] New: Arbitrary changing of tracks
- Re: [Bug 22365] New: The spec should explicitly say something about getUserMedia() in an iframe.
- Re: Questions about the MediaStream Image Capture API proposal
- Re: [Bug 22365] New: The spec should explicitly say something about getUserMedia() in an iframe.
- Re: [Bug 22365] New: The spec should explicitly say something about getUserMedia() in an iframe.
- Re: MediaStream ended vs inactive
- Re: types for direct assignment to media elements
- Re: [Bug 22338] New: Arbitrary changing of tracks
- [Bug 22354] Security and Privacy Considerations section needed
- Re: [Bug 22365] New: The spec should explicitly say something about getUserMedia() in an iframe.
- [Bug 22365] The spec should explicitly say something about getUserMedia() in an iframe.
- Re: [Bug 22365] New: The spec should explicitly say something about getUserMedia() in an iframe.
- Re: Media Capture and Streams question - applying constraints
- Re: [Bug 22365] New: The spec should explicitly say something about getUserMedia() in an iframe.
Friday, 14 June 2013
- [Bug 22366] New: Consider making stream URLs generated in an iframe, playable by the parent page.
- [Bug 22365] New: The spec should explicitly say something about getUserMedia() in an iframe.
- Re: Media Capture and Streams question - applying constraints
- [Bug 22250] Failure step of getUserMedia algorithm overrides name of error in case of unsatisfied constraints
- [Bug 22355] Create NavigatoreUserMediaError object with name attribute as appropriate before queuing error callback
Thursday, 13 June 2013
- Media Capture and Streams question - applying constraints
- [Bug 22355] New: Create NavigatoreUserMediaError object with name attribute as appropriate before queuing error callback
- [Bug 22354] New: Security and Privacy Considerations section needed
- Re: MediaStream ended vs inactive
- Re: questions about direct assignment
- Re: Image Capture Proposal, fifth version
- Image Capture Proposal, fifth version
Wednesday, 12 June 2013
- RE: new draft of recording
- Re: new draft of recording
- [Bug 22338] New: Arbitrary changing of tracks
- [Bug 22337] New: When does the light come on?
- RE: types for direct assignment to media elements
- Re: types for direct assignment to media elements
- RE: types for direct assignment to media elements
- Re: MediaStream ended vs inactive
- Re: types for direct assignment to media elements
- types for direct assignment to media elements
- RE: new draft of recording
- RE: MediaStream ended vs inactive
- Re: new draft of recording
- Re: new draft of recording
- Re: MediaStream ended vs inactive
- [Bug 22226] Remove check of same source from MediaStream constructor algorithm
- Re: MediaStream ended vs inactive
- Re: Future and getUserMedia
- Re: Future and getUserMedia
- Re: MediaStream ended vs inactive
- [Bug 20733] Format need to define how to negotiate: width, height, frame-rate
- [Bug 19568] MediaStreamTrackEvent is no longer defined
- REMINDER: Finishing Media Capture and Streams
- Re: MediaStream ended vs inactive
- Re: MediaStream ended vs inactive
Tuesday, 11 June 2013
- Re: MediaStream ended vs inactive
- RE: MediaStream ended vs inactive
- RE: MediaStream ended vs inactive
- MediaStream ended vs inactive
- [Bug 22226] Remove check of same source from MediaStream constructor algorithm
Monday, 10 June 2013
Saturday, 8 June 2013
Friday, 7 June 2013
- Re: Synchronous versus asynchronous getSourceInfos
- Re: Synchronous versus asynchronous getSourceInfos
Thursday, 6 June 2013
- RE: questions about direct assignment
- Re: questions about direct assignment
- Re: questions about direct assignment
- Re: questions about direct assignment
- Re: questions about direct assignment
Wednesday, 5 June 2013
- RE: questions about direct assignment
- Re: questions about direct assignment
- Re: Future and getUserMedia
- Re: Future and getUserMedia
- [Bug 22269] getSourceInfos should be asynchronous (and named getSourceInfo)
- Re: Future and getUserMedia
- Re: Future and getUserMedia
- Re: Future and getUserMedia
- [Bug 22263] Clarify synchronization of tracks in a MediaStream
- [Bug 22263] No requirement on synchronization of tracks in a MediaStream
- Re: questions about direct assignment
- Future and getUserMedia
- [Bug 22251] Define better error when no video or audio source is available
- [Bug 22251] Define better error when no video or audio source is available
- Re: questions about direct assignment
- [Bug 22263] No requirement on synchronization of tracks in a MediaStream
- [Bug 22263] No requirement on synchronization of tracks in a MediaStream
- Any point in removing duplicate ways to do the same thing?
- RE: questions about direct assignment
- Re: questions about direct assignment
- Re: questions about direct assignment
- Re: questions about direct assignment
- [Bug 22263] No requirement on synchronization of tracks in a MediaStream
- [Bug 22229] Editorial input
- [Bug 22263] No requirement on synchronization of tracks in a MediaStream
- Documents in scope for Futures discussion
- [Bug 22265] getSourceInfos() on non local stream tracks
Tuesday, 4 June 2013
- Re: Synchronous versus asynchronous getSourceInfos
- [Bug 22265] getSourceInfos() on non local stream tracks
- [Bug 22273] New: "When track constraints change" should be better described, referred from applyConstraints
- [Bug 22272] New: Permission revokation via MediaStreamTrack.stop()
- [Bug 22271] New: Terminology section should not have conformance requirements
- Re: Synchronous versus asynchronous getSourceInfos
- [Bug 22270] New: Adding tracks to MediaStream should only be possible for constructed streams
- [Bug 22269] New: getSourceInfos should be asynchronous (and named getSourceInfo)
- RE: Synchronous versus asynchronous getSourceInfos
- Re: Synchronous versus asynchronous getSourceInfos
- RE: Synchronous versus asynchronous getSourceInfos
- Re: Synchronous versus asynchronous getSourceInfos
- [Bug 22263] No requirement on synchronization of tracks in a MediaStream
- Re: Synchronous versus asynchronous getSourceInfos
- RE: Future of Futures in Chrome
- Future of Futures in Chrome
- Synchronous versus asynchronous getSourceInfos
- [Bug 22265] New: getSourceInfos() on non local stream tracks
- [Bug 22264] New: MediaStream.ended set to true on creation
- [Bug 22263] New: No requirement on synchronization of tracks in a MediaStream
- Re: Futures in WebRTC
- Re: Futures in WebRTC
- [Bug 22211] getUserMedia algorithm and unrecognized requestedMediaTypes
- Re: Futures in WebRTC
- [Bug 22260] New: Give guidance on defining MediaStream consumers
- [Bug 22259] Disabled mediastreamtrack and state of media element
- Re: Futures in WebRTC
- [Bug 22259] New: Disabled mediastreamtrack and state of media element
Monday, 3 June 2013
- Re: Futures in WebRTC
- [Bug 22252] New: usage of MUST to describe type of arguments to MediaStream() constructor
- [Bug 22251] New: Define better error when no video or audio source is available
- [Bug 22250] New: Failure step of getUserMedia algorithm overrides name of error in case of unsatisfied constraints
- [Bug 22249] New: should setting media.currentTime throw InvalidStateError?
- [Bug 22248] New: Relationship between MediaStreamTrack and HTML5 VideoTrack / AudioTrack after MediaStream assignment
- [Bug 22247] Setting loop attribute on a media element reading from a MediaStream
- [Bug 22247] New: Setting loop attribute on a media element reading from a MediaStream
- [Bug 22246] New: media.buffered should have length 0
- Re: subscribe access “back” acamera with html5 on android phone
- [Bug 21606] Add direct assignment of MediaStream to media element
- RE: questions about direct assignment
- Re: questions about direct assignment
- Details Futures teleconf
- [Bug 22243] New: Clarify readonly track
- [Bug 21606] Add direct assignment of MediaStream to media element
- Re: questions about direct assignment
- Re: questions about direct assignment
Sunday, 2 June 2013
- Re: subscribe access “back” acamera with html5 on android phone
- subscribe access “back” acamera with html5 on android phone