- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 08:42:13 +0100
- To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Cc: Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>, Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: >> I think you should first figure out what security properties you want >> and why. If I share my video camera stream with a page, that page can >> take snapshots using <canvas> and share those with any other origin >> using postMessage() or some server. > > That is currently the case, but there is some desire for WebRTC to support > routing a call through a Web site without giving the site access to the > contents of the call. (Personally I think that would be a very good > feature.) Creating a specialized unreadable stream object for this scenario might be better than trying to shoehorn those semantics into origin. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2013 07:42:42 UTC