- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 14:11:15 -0700
- To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- Cc: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, Tommy Widenflycht (ᛏᚮᛘᛘᚤ) <tommyw@google.com>, Victoria Kirst <vrk@google.com>
On 4 June 2013 13:51, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote: > While more grammatically correct, to me getSourceInfo reads like it's > getting the info about a particular source. How about getSources() (or > getUserSources) instead? getMediaSources, getSources, getUserMediaSources, or something like that is fine. Paint the shed whatever colour you please. > Also, as this makes getSourceInfos more like getUserMedia, is there a good > reason to have this as a static method on MediaStreamTrack as opposed to > Navigator, like getUserMedia? (I may have just missed this in the original > discussion) I value placement for establishing context. Besides, Navigator already has plenty of responsibilities.
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 21:11:46 UTC