On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote: > On 4 June 2013 13:51, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote: > > While more grammatically correct, to me getSourceInfo reads like it's > > getting the info about a particular source. How about getSources() (or > > getUserSources) instead? > > getMediaSources, getSources, getUserMediaSources, or something like > that is fine. Paint the shed whatever colour you please. > > If we keep the MediaStreamTrack scoping, MediaStreamTrack.getSources seems like the least verbose construction. > > Also, as this makes getSourceInfos more like getUserMedia, is there a > good > > reason to have this as a static method on MediaStreamTrack as opposed to > > Navigator, like getUserMedia? (I may have just missed this in the > original > > discussion) > > I value placement for establishing context. Besides, Navigator > already has plenty of responsibilities. > Consistency also has value. That said, this is also bikeshed territory.
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 22:54:37 UTC