About WG process Re: the role of public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Editorial ISSUES that can be closed IMHO
ISSUE-105: Possible compromise
ISSUE-105: Updated proposal with sh:prefixes
ISSUE-131: We could drop the shapesGraph argument from sh:hasShape
ISSUE-137: Proposal to add sh:langShape
- Bart van Leeuwen
- Holger Knublauch
- Holger Knublauch
- Andy Seaborne
- Arnaud Le Hors
- Holger Knublauch
- Dimitris Kontokostas
- Andy Seaborne
- Holger Knublauch
ISSUE-140: Suggestion to close
ISSUE-163 is done
ISSUE-176: Rules will not modify the data graph
ISSUE-180: Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core]
- Dimitris Kontokostas
- Holger Knublauch
- Eric Prud'hommeaux
- Dimitris Kontokostas
- Eric Prud'hommeaux
- Dimitris Kontokostas
- Simon Steyskal
ISSUE-71
ISSUE-71 (was: ISSUE-176: Rules will not modify the data graph)
Issues 71 & 137
Meeting times (was: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 1 September 2016)
Public mailing list
RDF Data Shapes agenda for 14 September 2016
RDF Data Shapes agenda for Tuesday 27 September 2016
RDF Data Shapes Minutes for 8 September 2016
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 21 September 2016
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 8 September 2016
RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 1 September 2016
RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 21 September 2016
RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 27 September 2016
Recursion (ISSUE-22)
SHACL draft renumbered?
SHACL Full
shapes-ACTION-41: Create some wiki documentation exploring the requirements
shapes-ACTION-42: Document library use cases for (remote) validation protocol
shapes-ACTION-43: Take a read through the spec and raise specific terminology issues as needed
shapes-ISSUE-155 (property pair constraints): problems in the description of property pair constraints [SHACL Spec]
shapes-ISSUE-177 (abstract-syntax-disconnected): Abstract Syntax is disconnected from concrete syntax
shapes-ISSUE-178 (sh:message constraints): Should sh:message be permitted at constraints, too? [SHACL - Core]
shapes-ISSUE-179 (label annotations): Should SHACL include a mechanism to specify display labels? [SHACL Spec]
shapes-ISSUE-180 (Path bnodes): Should IRI paths always be interpreted as predicates? [SHACL - Core]
shapes-ISSUE-181: SHACL conformance for partial validation reports [SHACL Spec]
- Karen Coyle
- Karen Coyle
- Dimitris Kontokostas
- Holger Knublauch
- Karen Coyle
- Holger Knublauch
- Karen Coyle
- Holger Knublauch
- Karen Coyle
- Holger Knublauch
- RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
shapes-ISSUE-182 (Validation report): [Editorial] Clarifications need to section 3.0
- Holger Knublauch
- Holger Knublauch
- Karen Coyle
- Holger Knublauch
- Karen Coyle
- RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker