W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > September 2016

Re: Test cases framework

From: mark <markh@metarelate.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:51:32 +0000
To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Cc: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20160927155132.0f6a066e@metarelate.net>
I haven't seen any further discussion on this topic.

I think it is a valuable thing to have a w3 maintained set of
validation cases

If no-one is actively using 
I would support retiring this (onto a branch, so it's not lost) and
putting the current set of test cases from TopQuadrant into the W3 space

I am happy to help administer this if it is a useful approach.

Holger: If I stepped in to help, would you be happy to start from your
current test cases and link your development flow into W3 test cases
resources once it is functional?

Are there other implementations that we should consider contacting
directly to encourage them to use a new shared set of test resources
who would help drive the development and maintenance of these?

What would working group members make of this approach?

all the best

On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:33:52 +1000
Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote:

> Just to point out some work related to test cases for SHACL.
> The current library of (53) test cases that I am using to validate
> the TopBraid SHACL API can be found at
> https://github.com/TopQuadrant/shacl/tree/master/src/test/resources/sh/tests
> The vocabulary, including tool support, is described here:
>      http://datashapes.org/testcases.html
> Who else has any test cases that are tracking the spec?
> The work on an official test cases format has been dormant:
> https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/tree/gh-pages/data-shapes-test-suite
> Is anyone still "driving" that format and the corresponding tests?
> Thanks,
> Holger
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 15:51:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:36 UTC