- From: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:03:31 +0200
- To: kcoyle@kcoyle.net
- Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Hi! Considering all the ongoing discussions regarding comments raised on the public mailing list and how to correctly/sufficiently address them (see also [1]), I was wondering to which extent we should try to satisfy comments raised on the public mailing list. For example, in one of Peter's recent emails he said: > When the issue cleanly closed the working group should send a message > to the commenter stating that > it has closed an issue based on his comments and asking whether he is > satisfied with the resolution of the issue. Which kind of implies (and that's only my personal, unverified impression) that a commenter could potentially object to any resolutions made by the WG, hence block the WG's progress. What's the point of being an official member of the WG then? br, simon [1] https://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#formal-address --- DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys Am 2016-09-28 20:34, schrieb Karen Coyle: > I believe we are obligated to listen to and respond to all comments. I > have offered to Arnaud and Eric create a wiki page for the issues > arising on the public list so that we can keep track of them. (the > threads morph, so it's a bit difficult to keep up.) At least that way > we will know if we have considered and responded to all of the > questions that arise, and decide which ones need to be formal issues. > > In my reading, some of these requests are not little, although they > may not be worded in the most direct way. Interpretation of them is > indeed tricky. > > kc > > On 9/27/16 4:16 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >> Is anyone here motivated enough to continue the conversations with >> Peter >> on the public comment mailing list? I find the style of communication >> there rather unhelpful. Are we forced to respond further? What if more >> people like this bombard us with all these little requests? >> >> I still have a day job, too. >> >> Holger >> >> >>
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2016 06:03:59 UTC