- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:23:05 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 9/22/16 4:53 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-106 as addressed here > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2015Oct/0223.html > > > PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-107 leaving annotation properties as currently > specified. > > PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-111 as outdated and too high-level to be actionable. I read this proposal as providing some language for the document introduction, not as a change to the standard. It seems to provide a clarification of the core v. extension that could be useful. The current introduction does not address the entire document, but seems to introduce the core only. (If desired, I could try an integration of this to the current intro.) kc > > PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-142 as addressed by the Terminology section and > its use throughout the document. > > PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-163 as addressed (also confirmed by Karen this week). > > Holger > > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Friday, 23 September 2016 16:23:36 UTC