ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 1998 by date

Tuesday, 26 May 1998

what does "unrecognized header fields" mean? Dave Kristol

Tuesday, 30 June 1998

Re: Implementations and implementation reports. Ben Laurie
Implementations and implementation reports. Jim Gettys
RE: draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt client imp? Larry Masinter

Monday, 29 June 1998

draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt client imp? Patrick McManus

Wednesday, 24 June 1998

rev-03 editorial crossref glitch Patrick McManus

Tuesday, 23 June 1998

New issue: DISPOSITION_EDIT Koen Holtman
Re: http 1.1 RFC Koen Holtman

Monday, 22 June 1998

http 1.1 RFC peter_lenahan@ibi.com

Tuesday, 16 June 1998

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-man-mec-09.txt,.ps Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Re: draft-ietf-http-state-man-mec-09.txt,.ps Dave Kristol

Monday, 15 June 1998

Re: Drawbacks of persistent connections Jim Gettys
Re: Advantages of persistent connections Jim Gettys
Re: Drawbacks of persistent connections Jim Gettys
Re: Drawbacks of persistent connections J.P. Martin-Flatin
Re: Multiple or unsolicited responses are forbidden J.P. Martin-Flatin
RE: Minor typos in Rev-03 etc. Larry Masinter
Re: Drawbacks of persistent connections J.P. Martin-Flatin
Re: Advantages of persistent connections Telford001@aol.com
RE: Advantages of persistent connections Josh Cohen

Sunday, 14 June 1998

Drawbacks of persistent connections J.P. Martin-Flatin
Advantages of persistent connections J.P. Martin-Flatin
100 Continue J.P. Martin-Flatin
Minor typos in Rev-03 J.P. Martin-Flatin
RE: Multiple or unsolicited responses are forbidden Josh Cohen
RE: Multiple or unsolicited responses are forbidden Larry Masinter
Multiple or unsolicited responses are forbidden J.P. Martin-Flatin
Connection tokens J.P. Martin-Flatin

Saturday, 6 June 1998

Patents, IETF, and HTTP Larry Masinter
RE: MOD - What is a Firewall? Josh Cohen

Friday, 5 June 1998

RE: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal Josh Cohen
RE: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal Jeffrey Mogul
Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal Simon Spero
Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal Simon Spero

Thursday, 4 June 1998

MOD - What is a Firewall? Carl-Uno Manros

Wednesday, 3 June 1998

Tuesday, 2 June 1998

Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for exis Albert Lunde

Friday, 5 June 1998

Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal Telford001@aol.com
Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal Jim Gettys
Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal David W. Morris
Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal Telford001@aol.com
Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal Jim Gettys
Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal Frank de Lange
RE: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal McDermott, Sean
Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal David W. Morris
Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal Howard Melman
Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal John C. Mallery
Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal Telford001@aol.com
RE: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal Josh Cohen

Thursday, 4 June 1998

IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal Benjamin

Wednesday, 3 June 1998

RE: IPP> RE: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers Yaron Goland
Re: IPP> RE: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers Dave Kristol
RE: IPP> RE: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers Yaron Goland
RE: IPP> RE: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers Yaron Goland
apologies Rob Polansky
RE: IPP> RE: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers Rob Polansky

Tuesday, 2 June 1998

finishing testing of HTTP/1.1 (help requested).... Jim Gettys
Re: Byte ranges Jeffrey Mogul

Monday, 1 June 1998

Re: IPP> Implications of introducing new scheme and port f PETER_E_MELLQUIST@hp-roseville-om3.om.hp.com

Tuesday, 2 June 1998

RE: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers Vinod Valloppillil (Exchange)
Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for exis Dominic.Chambers@mimesweeper.com
Re: Byte ranges Alex Rousskov
Re: IPP> RE: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers Randy Turner
Re: Byte ranges Dave Kristol
Re: Byte ranges John Franks
RE: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers Rob Polansky
Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers David W. Morris
Byte ranges John Franks

Monday, 1 June 1998

RE: IPP> Implications of introducing new scheme and port f Josh Cohen
RE: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers Turner, Randy
RE: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers Josh Cohen
Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers Carl-Uno Manros

Wednesday, 27 May 1998

RE: Comments on section 9.8, TRACE Catalin Floristean

Friday, 29 May 1998

416 implementation incompatibility V3 Josh Cohen

Thursday, 28 May 1998

[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-kristol-http-proxy-state-00.txt,.ps] Dave Kristol
Re: Comments on section 9.8, TRACE Dave Kristol

Wednesday, 27 May 1998

Re: Comments on section 9.8, TRACE Adam M. Donahue
response to protocol violations (was: what does "unrecognized header fields" mean?) rlgray@raleigh.ibm.com
Re: Comments on section 9.8, TRACE Dave Kristol

Saturday, 23 May 1998

Comments on section 9.8, TRACE Arthur P. Goldberg

Tuesday, 26 May 1998

response to protocol violations (was: what does "unrecognized header fields" mean?) Rob Polansky
Re: what does "unrecognized header fields" mean? Dave Kristol
Re: what does "unrecognized header fields" mean? Ross Patterson
Cache Control must > MUST rlgray@raleigh.ibm.com

Wednesday, 20 May 1998

Re: Non-order processing in persistent connections Joe Touch
Re: Non-order processing in persistent connections Mark Stemm
redirection issues Foteos Macrides

Tuesday, 19 May 1998

New issues list published... Jim Gettys
Re: Content-Encoding and Content-Type in trailer? Jim Gettys
Re: Non-order processing in persistent connections Jim Gettys
Re: Deployed use of HOST Header? Jeffrey Mogul
Re: Non-order processing in persistent connections Mark Stemm
RE: Non-order processing in persistent connections Josh Cohen
Re: Non-order processing in persistent connections Koen Holtman

Monday, 18 May 1998

RE: Non-order processing in persistent connections Josh Cohen
Re: Non-order processing in persistent connections Uwe Danz

Saturday, 16 May 1998

Non-order processing in persistent connections Zhou Kang

Sunday, 17 May 1998

Implementation report: does anyone implement non-CRLF text charsets? Larry Masinter
Deployed use of HOST Header? David W. Morris

Thursday, 14 May 1998

Re: outstanding issues: what's happening? Jeffrey Mogul
RE: Etag in nonce Scott Lawrence
RE: Etag in nonce Fisher Mark
Re: outstanding issues: what's happening? Adam M. Donahue

Wednesday, 13 May 1998

RE: outstanding issues: what's happening? Larry Masinter
Re: outstanding issues: what's happening? John Franks
5/13/98 http-authentication-01.txt comments Dave Kristol
outstanding issues: what's happening? Dave Kristol

Tuesday, 12 May 1998

Re: Proxies and gethostbyname Koen Holtman

Monday, 11 May 1998

Re: Proxies and gethostbyname David W. Morris
Re: Proxies and gethostbyname Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Thursday, 7 May 1998

RE: Protection spaces and proxy servers Josh Cohen

Tuesday, 5 May 1998

caching & revalidation, followup -- a question to proxy server authors Daniel Hellerstein

Friday, 1 May 1998

Protection spaces and proxy servers Dominic.Chambers@mimesweeper.com

Monday, 4 May 1998

Content-Encoding and Content-Type in trailer? Perry R. Ross
Re: caching vs revalidation in http1.1 Jeffrey Mogul
caching vs revalidation in http1.1 Daniel Hellerstein

Friday, 1 May 1998

Re: Digest auth and domain, again David W. Morris
Re: Digest auth and domain, again Daniel Hellerstein
Digest auth and domain= Dave Kristol
What is the REAL Address of this List David W. Morris
Re: Comments on draft HTTP/1.1 spec, v3 Adam M. Donahue
Re: Comments on draft HTTP/1.1 spec, v3 Scott Lawrence
Re: Comments on draft HTTP/1.1 spec, v3 David W. Morris
Re: Comments on draft HTTP/1.1 spec, v3 Dave Kristol
Re: Comments on draft HTTP/1.1 spec, v3 Adam M. Donahue

Thursday, 30 April 1998

Re: Slight editorial discrepancy in HTTP/1.1 Rev 3 Jeffrey Mogul
Re: Comments on draft HTTP/1.1 spec, v3 Jim Gettys
Re: Comments on draft HTTP/1.1 spec, v3 Dave Kristol
Re: TE: identity; q=0 Dave Kristol

Wednesday, 29 April 1998

Slight editorial discrepancy in HTTP/1.1 Rev 3 jchamberlain@iris.com
Comments on draft HTTP/1.1 spec, v3 Arthur P. Goldberg

Thursday, 30 April 1998

TR: question in caching in the HTTP1.1 MOKHTAR Ahmed CNET/DSM/REN

Wednesday, 29 April 1998

Re: TE: identity; q=0 Jeffrey Mogul
On te, and on case in the digest example (2nd send) Daniel Hellerstein
On te, and on case in the digest example. Daniel Hellerstein
Re: Digest Authentication: nc= Scott Lawrence
Digest Authentication: nc= Dave Kristol
TE: identity; q=0 Dave Kristol

Tuesday, 28 April 1998

Re: Proxies and gethostbyname David W. Morris
Re: Proxies and gethostbyname Roy T. Fielding
Re: Proxies and gethostbyname David W. Morris
Re: Proxies and gethostbyname Roy T. Fielding

Monday, 27 April 1998

Re: Proxies and gethostbyname David W. Morris
Re: Proxies and gethostbyname David W. Morris
Re: Proxies and gethostbyname Jeffrey Mogul
Proxies and gethostbyname Jim Gettys

Thursday, 23 April 1998

Re: question in caching in the HTTP1.1 Jeffrey Mogul
Re: Status of HTTP-WG documents John Franks
Re: Status of HTTP-WG documents Scott Lawrence
question in caching in the HTTP1.1 MOKHTAR Ahmed CNET/DSM/REN
Re: Status of HTTP-WG documents John Franks
Re: Digest test site available John Franks

Wednesday, 22 April 1998

Digest test site available Dave Kristol
Last Call: HTTP State Management Mechanism to Proposed Standard The IESG
Status of HTTP-WG documents Larry Masinter

Tuesday, 21 April 1998

Section 10.3.3 (302 Found) Foteos Macrides

Friday, 17 April 1998

Of possible interest: I-D on "Duplicate Suppression in HTTP" Jeffrey Mogul
RE: Digest auth and Range and qop=auth-int Paul Leach
Re: Confused about persistent connection for old clients David W. Morris
Re: Confused about persistent connection for old clients Dominic.Chambers@mimesweeper.com

Thursday, 16 April 1998

Re: Confused about persistent connection for old clients Scott Lawrence
Confused about persistent connection for old clients Windes, Edwin
Re: Digest auth and Range and qop=auth-int Scott Lawrence
Re: Digest auth and Range and qop=auth-int Dave Kristol
Re: Digest auth and Range and qop=auth-int John Franks

Wednesday, 15 April 1998

Digest auth and Range and qop=auth-int Dave Kristol

Friday, 10 April 1998

Implementing Hostname recognition in HTTP Servers Josh Bluestein

Monday, 13 April 1998

Unidentified subject! Wingard, Steve

Tuesday, 14 April 1998

Re: HTTP-authentication-01.txt comments John Franks
Re: HTTP-authentication-01.txt comments Scott Lawrence
4/14/98 http-authentication-01 comments Dave Kristol
Re: HTTP-authentication-01.txt comments Dave Kristol
HTTP-authentication-01.txt comments John Franks

Monday, 13 April 1998

Digest testing site available Dave Kristol
4/13/98 http-authentication-01.txt comments Dave Kristol

Saturday, 11 April 1998

Issue: warning header should be general header, not response header Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

Friday, 10 April 1998

Re: still more Digest auth questions/comments Dave Kristol
RE: still more Digest auth questions/comments Darren Anderson
still more Digest auth questions/comments Dave Kristol

Thursday, 9 April 1998

Re: more Digest auth questions/comments Dave Kristol
RE: Implementors' List? Larry Masinter
RE: HTTP 1.1 rev 3 permission Larry Masinter
more Digest auth questions/comments Dave Kristol

Wednesday, 8 April 1998

Implementors' List? Josh Bluestein

Thursday, 9 April 1998

Re: Copyright and cache Dominic.Chambers@mimesweeper.com
Re: More comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Life is hard... and then you die.
Re: Digest auth: what if client omits qop=? Life is hard... and then you die.
RE: Digest auth: what if client omits qop=? Paul Leach

Wednesday, 8 April 1998

Digest auth: what if client omits qop=? Dave Kristol

Tuesday, 7 April 1998

HTTP 1.1 rev 3 permission Elizabeth Spainhour
RE: ``canonical'' root URL of a server? Larry Masinter

Wednesday, 8 April 1998

RE: ``canonical'' root URL of a server? David W. Morris

Tuesday, 7 April 1998

RE: ``canonical'' root URL of a server? Paul Leach

Monday, 6 April 1998

Copyright and cache Riggi, María Eugenia
Re: HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested' Dave Kristol
RE: Multiple Proxy-Authenticate challenges? Larry Masinter
RE: Multiple Proxy-Authenticate challenges? Larry Masinter
Request for a copy of the document Jitendra K. Goel
RE: Multiple Proxy-Authenticate challenges? Jim Gettys
Re: More comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Gisle Aas
Re: More comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Life is hard... and then you die.

Saturday, 4 April 1998

RE: Multiple Proxy-Authenticate challenges? Paul Leach

Friday, 3 April 1998

Re: ``canonical'' root URL of a server? David W. Morris
``canonical'' root URL of a server? Mike_Spreitzer.PARC@xerox.com
More comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt Gisle Aas

Thursday, 2 April 1998

Multiple Proxy-Authenticate challenges? Gisle Aas

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 June 1998 11:42:16 UTC