- From: Josh Cohen <joshco@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 May 1998 01:50:11 -0700
- To: koen@win.tue.nl
- Cc: ZhouKang@cheerful.com, http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
> -----Original Message----- > From: koen@win.tue.nl [mailto:koen@win.tue.nl] > Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 1998 12:50 AM > To: Josh Cohen > Cc: ZhouKang@cheerful.com; http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com > Subject: Re: Non-order processing in persistent connections > I'd like to add though that, as far as I know, most people do not > consider out-of-order responses to be the logical next step in > improving 1.1. The preferred next step seems to be to add > multiplexing of several HTTP connections over a single TCP connection. > Multiplexing has some additional advantages over out-of-order > responses. See http://www.w3.org/Protocols/MUX/ for one effort in > this direction. > I totally agree with you in preferring mux over out-of-order responses.. While out-of-order would be on the 'good' list of things, effort spent on MUX would be more worthwhile, IMHO. A MUX allows much more than out of order responses and the work on MUX can be leveraged for other things besides just HTTP. > Koen. >
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 1998 01:52:56 UTC