1) Dave Kristol wrote >So, I'm thinking about implementing this, and it occurs to me that it's crazy to allow TE: identity; q=0. For what it's worth, it does seem silly to me to. In my implementation, I only check TE for 1.1 clients (perhaps that's a mistake?), and when identity;q=0, I chunk it and send it back. 2) The digest example (on pg 17 of the digest authentication draft):Received on Wednesday, 29 April 1998 07:39:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:43:05 UTC