On te, and on case in the digest example.

• From: Daniel Hellerstein <danielh@mailbox.econ.ag.gov>
• Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 10:34:09 -0400
• To: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
• Message-Id: <s5470261.078@MAILBOX.ECON.AG.GOV>

1) Dave Kristol  wrote
>So, I'm thinking about implementing this, and it occurs to me that it's
crazy to allow TE: identity; q=0.

For what it's worth, it does seem silly to me to.

In my implementation, I only check TE for 1.1 clients (perhaps that's a
mistake?), and when identity;q=0,  I  chunk it and send it back.

2) The digest example (on pg 17 of the digest authentication draft):

Received on Wednesday, 29 April 1998 07:39:56 UTC