On te, and on case in the digest example.

1) Dave Kristol  wrote
>So, I'm thinking about implementing this, and it occurs to me that it's
crazy to allow TE: identity; q=0.

For what it's worth, it does seem silly to me to.

In my implementation, I only check TE for 1.1 clients (perhaps that's a
mistake?), and when identity;q=0,  I  chunk it and send it back.

2) The digest example (on pg 17 of the digest authentication draft):