what does "unrecognized header fields" mean?
draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt client imp?
rev-03 editorial crossref glitch
http 1.1 RFC
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-state-man-mec-09.txt,.ps
Re: draft-ietf-http-state-man-mec-09.txt,.ps
Drawbacks of persistent connections
Advantages of persistent connections
100 Continue
Minor typos in Rev-03
Multiple or unsolicited responses are forbidden
- RE: Multiple or unsolicited responses are forbidden
- RE: Multiple or unsolicited responses are forbidden
Connection tokens
Patents, IETF, and HTTP
MOD - What is a Firewall?
IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal
- RE: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal
- Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal
- Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal
- Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal
- RE: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal
- Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal
- Re: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal
- RE: IBM patents tunneling HTTP through another protocal
RE: IPP> RE: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers
RE: IPP> RE: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers
- RE: IPP> RE: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers
- RE: IPP> RE: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers
- RE: IPP> RE: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers
apologies
finishing testing of HTTP/1.1 (help requested)....
RE: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers
Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for exis
Byte ranges
RE: IPP> Implications of introducing new scheme and port f
RE: IPP> Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers
Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers
- Re: Implications of introducing new scheme and port for existing HTTP servers
- Re: IPP> Implications of introducing new scheme and port f
416 implementation incompatibility V3
[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-kristol-http-proxy-state-00.txt,.ps]
response to protocol violations (was: what does "unrecognized header fields" mean?)
Comments on section 9.8, TRACE
- Re: Comments on section 9.8, TRACE
- Re: Comments on section 9.8, TRACE
- RE: Comments on section 9.8, TRACE
Cache Control must > MUST
redirection issues
New issues list published...
Non-order processing in persistent connections
- Re: Non-order processing in persistent connections
- RE: Non-order processing in persistent connections
- RE: Non-order processing in persistent connections
- Re: Non-order processing in persistent connections
Implementation report: does anyone implement non-CRLF text charsets?
Deployed use of HOST Header?
RE: Etag in nonce
5/13/98 http-authentication-01.txt comments
outstanding issues: what's happening?
- Re: outstanding issues: what's happening?
- RE: outstanding issues: what's happening?
- Re: outstanding issues: what's happening?
caching & revalidation, followup -- a question to proxy server authors
Protection spaces and proxy servers
Content-Encoding and Content-Type in trailer?
caching vs revalidation in http1.1
Re: Digest auth and domain, again
Digest auth and domain=
What is the REAL Address of this List
Slight editorial discrepancy in HTTP/1.1 Rev 3
Comments on draft HTTP/1.1 spec, v3
- Re: Comments on draft HTTP/1.1 spec, v3
- Re: Comments on draft HTTP/1.1 spec, v3
- Re: Comments on draft HTTP/1.1 spec, v3
TR: question in caching in the HTTP1.1
On te, and on case in the digest example (2nd send)
On te, and on case in the digest example.
Digest Authentication: nc=
TE: identity; q=0
Proxies and gethostbyname
question in caching in the HTTP1.1
Digest test site available
Last Call: HTTP State Management Mechanism to Proposed Standard
Status of HTTP-WG documents
Section 10.3.3 (302 Found)
Of possible interest: I-D on "Duplicate Suppression in HTTP"
Confused about persistent connection for old clients
- Re: Confused about persistent connection for old clients
- Re: Confused about persistent connection for old clients
Digest auth and Range and qop=auth-int
- Re: Digest auth and Range and qop=auth-int
- Re: Digest auth and Range and qop=auth-int
- RE: Digest auth and Range and qop=auth-int
Implementing Hostname recognition in HTTP Servers
Unidentified subject!
4/14/98 http-authentication-01 comments
Digest testing site available
4/13/98 http-authentication-01.txt comments
Issue: warning header should be general header, not response header
still more Digest auth questions/comments
more Digest auth questions/comments
Implementors' List?
Re: Digest auth: what if client omits qop=?
Digest auth: what if client omits qop=?
HTTP 1.1 rev 3 permission
Copyright and cache
Re: HTTP features w/ low 'implemented' and 'tested'
``canonical'' root URL of a server?
- Re: ``canonical'' root URL of a server?
- RE: ``canonical'' root URL of a server?
- RE: ``canonical'' root URL of a server?
- RE: ``canonical'' root URL of a server?
More comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt
- Re: More comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt
- Re: More comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt
- Re: More comments on draft-ietf-http-authentication-01.txt