- From: Dave Kristol <dmk@bell-labs.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 14:58:09 -0400
- To: John Franks <john@math.nwu.edu>
- Cc: http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com
John Franks wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, Dave Kristol wrote: > > > > > 3.2.3 The Authentication-Info Header > > > > cnonce and qop are used in the calculation of response-digest. The > > client is not required to send either cnonce= or auth=. So I assume > > (correct?) that the null string is used for values for omitted > > attributes in the calculation. > > > > If (to use cnonce as the example) cnonce was omitted, should > > Authentication-Info omit cnonce, or should it send cnonce=""? Same > > question for auth. > > > > It might be better to say that Authentication-Info should only be > sent if qop (and hence cnonce) are present. But cnonce is not required, even when qop is specified. Only nonce-count is required. > > Another question: Unless I am mistaken, at one point in the long > sequence of digest drafts, the Authentication-Info header could be > supplied by either the server or the client. It would be useful > for the client to be able to supply the digest of POSTed data > or a file which is PUT. Being able to assure the integrity of > client supplied data would be very useful. Did this fall through > the cracks, or am I just missing this functionality somewhere in > the draft? Hmmm. There does not seem to be a way for the client to send a digest of the entity-body. If it could, though, there's an ambiguity about qop=auth-int: 1) C<-S HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized WWW-Authenticate: ... qop="auth,auth-int", ... 2) C->S (speculative) POST /some/entity HTTP/1.1 Host: blah Authorization: ... qop=auth-int, ... Authentication-Info: reqauth=<some suitable digest>, ... 3) C<-S (problematic) HTTP/1.1 200 OK Authentication-Info: qop=auth-int, rspauth=<entity digest> The problem is that the client chose (this is speculative -- the spec. doesn't read this way) "auth-int", in order to send an entity digest. But the server is obliged to respond in kind, which means it must do a digest of what is probably not a very interesting response. Dave Kristol
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 1998 12:05:26 UTC