public-swbp-wg@w3.org from April 2004 by author

Aditya A Kalyanpur

• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Thursday, 15 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Thursday, 15 April)
• telecon regrets (Thursday, 15 April)
• Q on scope of ADTF (Thursday, 1 April)

Alan Rector

• Re: [UNITS, OEP] FAQ : Constraints on data values range (Friday, 30 April)
• Classes as values (Wednesday, 28 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Friday, 23 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Thursday, 22 April)
• Re: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical (Wednesday, 21 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Monday, 19 April)
• [OPEN] and/or [PORT]: Role of Classification (Monday, 19 April)
• Re: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) (Monday, 19 April)

Aldo Gangemi

• [WNET] Fwd: Re: W3C Task Force on Porting Wordnet to the Semantic Web (Friday, 30 April)
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": comments on draft $swbp (Friday, 30 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft (Tuesday, 27 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics (Thursday, 22 April)
• Re: WordNet TF: short note on porting issues (Thursday, 1 April)
• Re: ALL: agenda April 1 telecon (Thursday, 1 April)

Ben Adida

• Re: partial regrets for 15-April (Wednesday, 14 April)

Ben Booth

• meeting record: 2004-04-15 SemWeb BPD WG telecon (Thursday, 15 April)
• Introduction (Thursday, 15 April)

Benjamin Nguyen

• Short Introduction (Wednesday, 28 April)

benoit.doumas@free.fr

• RE: [UNITS, OEP] FAQ : Constraints on data values range (Tuesday, 13 April)

Bernard Vatant

• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft (Friday, 30 April)
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft (Friday, 30 April)
• RE: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon (Thursday, 29 April)
• ECOTERM - RE: [THES] drafting Thesaurus TF overview (Friday, 23 April)
• [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range (Friday, 9 April)
• RE: [THES] drafting Thesaurus TF overview (Thursday, 8 April)
• RE: agenda April 1 telecon (Thursday, 1 April)
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments (Thursday, 1 April)

Dan Brickley

• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values": comments on draft (Thursday, 29 April)
• regrets for BP telecon / electronic dictionaries (Thursday, 15 April)
• [THES] drafting Thesaurus TF overview (Thursday, 1 April)

Danny Ayers

• Killer App: IRS (Tuesday, 6 April)

David Norheim

• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon (Thursday, 29 April)
• Regrets (Thursday, 15 April)
• Re: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the TF (Monday, 5 April)

Deborah L. McGuinness

• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft $swbpd (Thursday, 29 April)
• timing for april 29 telecon (Thursday, 22 April)
• Re: [ALL, OEP] Relationship between OWL and other ontology modelling (Tuesday, 20 April)
• Re: OEP and Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon (Thursday, 15 April)
• OEP and Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon (Wednesday, 14 April)
• telecon scheduling (Thursday, 1 April)

ewallace@cme.nist.gov

• Re: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web (Friday, 30 April)
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft $swbpd (Wednesday, 28 April)
• Re: [ALL, OEP] Relationship between OWL and other ontology modelling (Tuesday, 20 April)
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Thursday, 15 April)
• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] (Thursday, 15 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon (Wednesday, 14 April)
• RE: [UNITS, OEP] FAQ : Constraints on data values range (Wednesday, 14 April)
• Re: [ALL, OEP] Relationship between OWL and other ontology modelling languages $swbpd (Wednesday, 14 April)

Fabien Gandon

• [ALL] F2F meeting at ESWS / OntoWeb / KnowledgeWeb in Crete (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: Classes as values (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Tuesday, 20 April)
• [ALL] F2F at ESWS in Heraklion (Thursday, 15 April)
• Re: [UNITS, OEP] FAQ : Constraints on data values range (Thursday, 15 April)
• Would these be examples of questions for some best practices FAQ? (Friday, 2 April)
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments (Friday, 2 April)
• Introduction (Thursday, 1 April)

Frank van Harmelen

• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd (Saturday, 17 April)
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments (Monday, 5 April)
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments (Monday, 5 April)

Gary Ng

• RE: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon (Thursday, 29 April)

Guus Schreiber

• [PORT] method note (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon (Wednesday, 28 April)
• [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon (Wednesday, 28 April)
• Re: [ALL, XSCH] Proposal for telecon (Tuesday, 27 April)
• Re: [OEP] Summary please (Tuesday, 27 April)
• Re: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] (Wednesday, 14 April)
• [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon (Wednesday, 14 April)
• Re: [THES] drafting Thesaurus TF overview (Wednesday, 14 April)
• [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] (Wednesday, 14 April)
• Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range (Wednesday, 14 April)
• Re: [ALL] More TF topics...? (Sunday, 4 April)
• WordNet TF: short note on porting issues (Thursday, 1 April)
• RE: agenda April 1 telecon (Thursday, 1 April)
• Re: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) (Thursday, 1 April)

J.R. van Ossenbruggen

• [Fwd: [OEP,ALL] Potential FAQ: annotation schema problem (Wednesday, 28 April)

Jennifer Golbeck

• regrets for telecon (Thursday, 15 April)
• Distribution of Species Use (Monday, 5 April)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web (Friday, 30 April)
• Re: Syntax Proposal [All] $swbp (Friday, 30 April)
• Re: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon (Wednesday, 28 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft $swbpd (Wednesday, 28 April)
• RE: [XSCH] draft comment on XML Schema WG draft charter (Tuesday, 27 April)
• [OEP] Summary please (Tuesday, 27 April)
• [ALL, XSCH] Proposal for telecon (Wednesday, 21 April)
• Re: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web (Wednesday, 21 April)
• [XSCH] draft comment on XML Schema WG draft charter (Monday, 19 April)
• [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web (Monday, 19 April)
• RE: [UNITS, OEP] FAQ : Constraints on data values range (Monday, 19 April)
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) (Monday, 19 April)
• Regrets (Wednesday, 14 April)
• Re: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments (Wednesday, 7 April)
• Re: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments (Tuesday, 6 April)
• Re: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments (Tuesday, 6 April)
• Re: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the ? TF (Monday, 5 April)
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments (Friday, 2 April)
• Re: [WRLD] issue from Jena-dev (Thursday, 1 April)
• Re: [WRLD] issue from Jena-dev (Thursday, 1 April)

Jim Hendler

• Re: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical (Wednesday, 21 April)
• Re: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web (Wednesday, 21 April)
• Re: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical (Wednesday, 21 April)
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) $swbpd (Wednesday, 21 April)
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) (Sunday, 18 April)
• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd (Sunday, 18 April)
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Thursday, 15 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Thursday, 15 April)
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments (Monday, 5 April)
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments (Monday, 5 April)
• RE: [OEP] Scope - (was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)) (Monday, 5 April)
• Re: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the ? TF (Monday, 5 April)
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) (Thursday, 1 April)

Jos De_Roo

• Re: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web (Friday, 30 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon (Thursday, 29 April)
• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd (Sunday, 18 April)
• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd (Saturday, 17 April)
• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd (Saturday, 17 April)
• Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range (Friday, 16 April)

Libby Miller

• [ADTF] possible illustration of apps and demos direction (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the TF (Monday, 5 April)
• Re: WordNet Task Force - work outline (Thursday, 1 April)

Mark Birbeck

• RE: Whether property values should be namespace prefixed (Thursday, 15 April)

McBride, Brian

• RE: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon (Thursday, 29 April)
• RE: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the TF (Monday, 5 April)
• RE: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the TF (Friday, 2 April)
• Summary of On a possible role for the applications and demos tas k force (Thursday, 1 April)
• RE: agenda April 1 telecon (Thursday, 1 April)

Miles, AJ (Alistair)

• [PORT] policy on URI structure for thesaurus concepts (Friday, 30 April)
• [PORT] SKOS migration guidelines (Friday, 30 April)
• Announcement of SWAD-Europe SKOS API for thesauri web service (Thursday, 29 April)
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": comments on draft (Thursday, 29 April)
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": comments on draft (Thursday, 29 April)
• [ALL] Introduction (Wednesday, 28 April)
• RE: ECOTERM - RE: [THES] drafting Thesaurus TF overview (Wednesday, 28 April)

NANNI Marco FTRD/DMI/SOP

• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Thursday, 15 April)
• RE: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon (Thursday, 15 April)
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Thursday, 15 April)
• [OEP] or [UNITS] : How to explicitly define a Metaclass (Wednesday, 14 April)
• RE: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the TF (Monday, 5 April)
• [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the TF (Friday, 2 April)
• RE: Q on scope of ADTF (Friday, 2 April)
• A simple exercise (was RE : philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) (Thursday, 1 April)
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) (Thursday, 1 April)

Natasha Noy

• Re: [OEP] Ontological purity, was "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics $swbpd (Tuesday, 27 April)
• [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft (Tuesday, 27 April)
• Re: [OEP] Ontological purity, was "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics $swbpd (Saturday, 24 April)
• Re: [OEP] using rdfs:isDefinedBy [was "Classes as values" first draft] (Saturday, 24 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics (Saturday, 24 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Saturday, 24 April)
• [OEP] Suggestions for other patterns (Wednesday, 21 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Wednesday, 21 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Wednesday, 21 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Monday, 19 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Monday, 19 April)
• Re: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Monday, 19 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon (Thursday, 15 April)
• [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Wednesday, 14 April)
• Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range (Friday, 9 April)

Nick Gibbins

• Regrets for 2004-04-15 telecon (Wednesday, 14 April)
• Re: [WRLD] issue from Jena-dev (Thursday, 1 April)
• Re: [WRLD] issue from Jena-dev (Thursday, 1 April)

Oscar Corcho

• RE: [OEP] or [UNITS] : How to explicitly define a Metaclass (Wednesday, 14 April)
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments (Tuesday, 6 April)

Pat Hayes

• Re: Syntax Proposal [All] $swbp (Friday, 30 April)
• Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range (Friday, 16 April)
• RE: [OEP] Scope - (was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)) (Thursday, 15 April)
• Re: [OPEN] Guideline for when standard definitions are inadequate (was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)) (Thursday, 15 April)
• RE: [UNITS, OEP] FAQ : Constraints on data values range (Thursday, 15 April)
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values" first draft (Thursday, 15 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon (Thursday, 15 April)

Ralph R. Swick

• Re: [ALL] Agenda 29 April telecon (Wednesday, 28 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda 15 April telecon (Thursday, 15 April)
• partial regrets for 15-April (Wednesday, 14 April)
• [ALL] straw poll open for SWBPD telecon times (Friday, 9 April)
• meeting record: 2004-04-01 SemWeb BPD WG telecon (Tuesday, 6 April)

Sean Bechhofer

• Re: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments (Tuesday, 6 April)

Seth Ladd

• tips on getting blog projects to include more triples? (Friday, 16 April)

Thomas Baker

• Re: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the ? TF (Monday, 5 April)
• Re: [WRLD] Some few questions about the formal description of the ? TF (Monday, 5 April)
• [ALL] More TF topics...? (Friday, 2 April)
• Introduction: Tom Baker (Thursday, 1 April)

Uschold, Michael F

• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbp (Friday, 30 April)
• RE: [ALL] Requirements for updating OWL -- was FAQ : Constraints on data values range (Friday, 30 April)
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft (Friday, 30 April)
• RE: Syntax Proposal [All] $swbp (Friday, 30 April)
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": comments on draft $swbp (Friday, 30 April)
• RE: [ALL,XSCH] draft TF description: XML Schema Datatypes and Semantic Web (Friday, 30 April)
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": comments on draft $swbp (Thursday, 29 April)
• RE: Classes as values $swbp (Thursday, 29 April)
• Syntax Proposal [All] $swbp (Thursday, 29 April)
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft $swbpd (Wednesday, 28 April)
• RE: [OEP] "Classes as values": summary of the discussion so far and second draft $swbpd (Wednesday, 28 April)
• FW: [OEP] Ontological purity, was "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics $swbpd (Monday, 26 April)
• RE: [OEP] Ontological purity, was "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics $swbpd (Monday, 26 April)
• RE: [OEP] Ontological purity, was "Classes as values" first draft + ODP basics $swbpd (Saturday, 24 April)
• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraintson datavalues range] $swbpd (Tuesday, 20 April)
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) $swbpd (Monday, 19 April)
• RE: philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question) (Saturday, 17 April)
• RE: [OPEN] Guideline for when standard definitions areinadequate(was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)) (Saturday, 17 April)
• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] $swbpd (Saturday, 17 April)
• [All, OEP, WRLD] F2F at WWW in NYC $swbpd (Thursday, 15 April)
• RE: [OEP] a Quantity pattern? [was: Re: [UNITS] FAQ : Constraints on data values range] (Thursday, 15 April)
• [ALL, OEP] Relationship between OWL and other ontology modelling languages $swbpd (Wednesday, 14 April)
• RE: [UNITS, OEP] FAQ : Constraints on data values range (Saturday, 10 April)
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments (Tuesday, 6 April)
• RE: [OEP] Scope - (was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)) (Tuesday, 6 April)
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments (Monday, 5 April)
• RE: [ALL] WordNet Task Force - work outline (Monday, 5 April)
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments (Monday, 5 April)
• RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments (Monday, 5 April)
• RE: [WRLD] issue from Jena-dev (Monday, 5 April)
• RE: [OEP] Scope - (was philosophy of SWBPD (was Re: [OPEN] and/or [PORT] : a practical question)) (Monday, 5 April)

Last message date: Friday, 30 April 2004 19:25:14 UTC