W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > April 2004

RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 15:56:24 +0200
To: <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>, <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDGEODCCAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


I have code that does that - what was being asked for was yet another format
(based on OWL abstract syntax) for which a very good advert is the work Guus
circulated on WordNet.

I don't find any of these ideal.

Jeremy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Fabien Gandon
> Sent: 02 April 2004 15:26
> To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
> Subject: RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Would it be impractical to consider having both syntaxes in the
> documents issued by this working groups?
> Something like in the test case document of OWL:
>
>   _______________________________________
> |
> |  <owl:Class rdf:ID="A">
> |    <first:ap>
> |       <owl:Class rdf:ID="B"/>
> |    </first:ap>
> |  </owl:Class>
> |  <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:ID="ap"/>
> |_______________________________________
> |
> | first:A rdf:type owl:Class .
> | first:B rdf:type owl:Class .
> | first:A first:ap first:B .
> | first:ap rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
> |_______________________________________
>
>
> Fabien.
> --
> "The best way to steal souls is to divide peoples."
>   ____________
> |__ _ |_  http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/
> |  (_||_) INRIA Sophia Antipolis - ph# (33)(0)4 92 38 77 88
>
>
Received on Friday, 2 April 2004 09:05:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:38 UTC