W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > April 2004

RE: [ALL] Human-friendly syntax for communicating OWL fragments

From: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 15:25:40 +0200
Message-ID: <406D69D4.9090309@sophia.inria.fr>
To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org

Hi,

Would it be impractical to consider having both syntaxes in the 
documents issued by this working groups?
Something like in the test case document of OWL:

  _______________________________________
|
|  <owl:Class rdf:ID="A">
|    <first:ap>
|       <owl:Class rdf:ID="B"/>
|    </first:ap>
|  </owl:Class>
|  <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:ID="ap"/>
|_______________________________________
|
| first:A rdf:type owl:Class .
| first:B rdf:type owl:Class .
| first:A first:ap first:B .
| first:ap rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty .
|_______________________________________


Fabien.
-- 
"The best way to steal souls is to divide peoples."
  ____________
|__ _ |_  http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/
|  (_||_) INRIA Sophia Antipolis - ph# (33)(0)4 92 38 77 88
Received on Friday, 2 April 2004 08:27:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:38 UTC