- From: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>
- Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 15:25:40 +0200
- To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Hi, Would it be impractical to consider having both syntaxes in the documents issued by this working groups? Something like in the test case document of OWL: _______________________________________ | | <owl:Class rdf:ID="A"> | <first:ap> | <owl:Class rdf:ID="B"/> | </first:ap> | </owl:Class> | <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:ID="ap"/> |_______________________________________ | | first:A rdf:type owl:Class . | first:B rdf:type owl:Class . | first:A first:ap first:B . | first:ap rdf:type owl:AnnotationProperty . |_______________________________________ Fabien. -- "The best way to steal souls is to divide peoples." ____________ |__ _ |_ http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/ | (_||_) INRIA Sophia Antipolis - ph# (33)(0)4 92 38 77 88
Received on Friday, 2 April 2004 08:27:52 UTC