> formal model. I recommend a paper "Web Ontology Reasoning with > Datatype Groups" > form J. Pan and I. Horrocks. > I think this is a problem that has to be explain in a FAQ. > I think that we currently have, in OWL, particularly OWL DL, and unnecessarily restrictive langauge for this problem. However, I am not clear that enough industrial class apps are up with what datatype support there is already in OWL, so I am in no hurry to move the goal posts towards expressivity. Some of Pan and Horrocks' work goes well beyond OWL expressivity and looks really useful for the units stuff amongst others. I remain doubtful as to the scientific validity of the current exclusion of inverse functional datatype properties (IFDP) in OWL DL, but didn't make a song and dance about it at the appropriate time, and won't now either. As far as I remember it is a complexity argument rather than a decidability argument, and it seems to me that OWL DL + IFDP is of the same complexity as OWL DL (maybe I have misunderstood; I've read the papers but couldn't reconstruct them). JeremyReceived on Monday, 19 April 2004 11:24:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:11 GMT