Jim Hendler wrote: [snip] > In case anyone hasn't figured it out by now - I THINK IT SHOULD BE OUT > OF SCOPE FOR THIS TASK FORCE TO WRITE ONTOLOGY ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS HAT > ARE NOT RELATED TO THE SEMANTIC WEB as part of this Working Group. If > you'd like me to state it clearer, let me know what to addd Exactly. We should focus on the low-hanging fruit that is useful for semweb developers. That's why the charter talks about part-of and defaults, as those are among the prime expressivity requirements of our customers and at the same time are not handled in obvious ways by our languages. Certainly in part-of theory there should be enough to point people to typical solutions and pitfalls. Guus [...] -- Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718 E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/Received on Thursday, 1 April 2004 06:33:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:11 GMT