Friday, 31 October 2003
Thursday, 30 October 2003
- Default value for Element Vs Attribute
- Re: Validating document with schema
- Re: Validating document with schema
- Re: key & keyref problem (invalid XPath)
Wednesday, 29 October 2003
- RE: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction
- Re: key & keyref problem (invalid XPath)
- Re: key & keyref problem (invalid XPath)
- Re: More about pointless things
- Re: Is document order of content in XML required?
- Re: key & keyref problem (invalid XPath)
- Seeking a Schema to HTML forms API
Tuesday, 28 October 2003
- schema for this case
- More about pointless things
- Is document order of content in XML required?
- key & keyref problem (invalid XPath)
- Problem with validating docuemnt w/Valid Schema
- message-based services using axis
- RE: Changing "substitutionGroup" to "choice" and maintaining the validation equality of the schema
- RE: Changing "substitutionGroup" to "choice" and maintaining the validation equality of the schema
Monday, 27 October 2003
- RE: [xmlschema-dev] <none>
- Re: [xmlschema-dev] <none>
- RE: [xmlschema-dev] <none>
- FW: Sch Comp Cons: Particle Derivation OK (All/Choice/Sequence:Any -- NSRecurseCheckCardinality)
- Sch Comp Cons: Particle Derivation OK (All/Choice/Sequence:Any -- NSRecurseCheckCardinality)
- Re: Invalid per cvc-complex-type.1.3: undeclared attribute {None}:use
- Re: [xmlschema-dev] <none>
- re:¤@«Ê¦¬¨ì±zªº¦^ÂÐ
- re:¤@«Ê¦¬¨ì±zªº¦^ÂÐ
- Re: processContents=strict + xsi:type
- re:¤@«Ê¦¬¨ì±zªº¦^ÂÐ
- re:¤@«Ê¦¬¨ì±zªº¦^ÂÐ
- RE: Changing "substitutionGroup" to "choice" and maintaining the validation equality of the schema
- processContents=strict + xsi:type
Sunday, 26 October 2003
- Re: Pointless <sequence>, <choice>, <all>
- Re: <xs:attribute use='prohibited'> question
- Re: Invalid per cvc-complex-type.1.3: undeclared attribute {None}:use
- Re: <xs:attribute use='prohibited'> question
- Re: XSV: Question on treatment of schema imports
- Re: Validating document with schema
Saturday, 25 October 2003
Friday, 24 October 2003
- [xmlschema-dev] <none>
- Re: Pointless <sequence>, <choice>, <all>
- Re: schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??
- Re: Invalid per cvc-complex-type.1.3: undeclared attribute {None}:use
- RE: Invalid per cvc-complex-type.1.3: undeclared attribute {None}:use
Thursday, 23 October 2003
- RE: Invalid per cvc-complex-type.1.3: undeclared attribute {None}:use
- Re: schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??
- Re: Invalid per cvc-complex-type.1.3: undeclared attribute {None}:use
- Re: <xs:attribute use='prohibited'> question
- Pointless <sequence>, <choice>, <all>
- Invalid per cvc-complex-type.1.3: undeclared attribute {None}:use
- RE: Validating document with schema
Wednesday, 22 October 2003
- Re: <xs:attribute use='prohibited'> question
- XSV: Question on treatment of schema imports
- <xs:attribute use='prohibited'> question
- help for getting value of attributes elementFormDefault and attributeFormDefault using SOM
Tuesday, 21 October 2003
- Re: change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??
- Re: change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??
- Re: change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??
- RE: Validating document with schema
- RE: Validating document with schema
- RE: Validating document with schema
- Re: Validating document with schema
- Re: Validating document with schema
Monday, 20 October 2003
- Validating document with schema
- ANN: Syntext Serna Beta-3 Release: XML Schema on-the-fly WYSIWYG XML Editor
Saturday, 18 October 2003
- Re: change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??
- Re: change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??
- RE: change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??
- Re: change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??
- RE: change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??
- change the question slightly maybe...schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??
- no response??? schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??
- Re: what are the new research issues in xml
Friday, 17 October 2003
- Re: Nested Substitutiongroups, how to?
- RE: Changing "substitutionGroup" to "choice" and maintaining the validation equality of the schema
- Re: Nested Substitutiongroups, how to?
- RE: Changing "substitutionGroup" to "choice" and maintaining the validation equality of the schema
- RE: Changing "substitutionGroup" to "choice" and maintaining the validation equality of the schema
- RE: extension of an abstract complexType
- RE: extension of an abstract complexType
Thursday, 16 October 2003
- RE: Changing "substitutionGroup" to "choice" and maintaining the validation equality of the schema
- Re: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction
- [ANN] XSDdoc 2.0 - XML Schema Documentation/Browsing Software.
Wednesday, 15 October 2003
- Changing "substitutionGroup" to "choice" and maintaining the validation equality of the schema
- schemas, leveraging their object orientedness??
- Re: Nested Substitutiongroups, how to?
- ANN: X2U - XML Editor
- RE: extension of an abstract complexType
- extension of an abstract complexType
Tuesday, 14 October 2003
- Re: Nested Substitutiongroups, how to?
- RE: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction
- Updated Schema Validation Service
- Re: Text and elements as childs?
- Text and elements as childs?
- Re: Problem with .NET - substitution group membership not allowed
- Re: Nested Substitutiongroups, how to?
- Nested Substitutiongroups, how to?
Monday, 13 October 2003
Saturday, 11 October 2003
Friday, 10 October 2003
- Retrieving namespace as schema?
- RE: Problem with .NET - substitution group membership not allowed
- RE: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction
- Re: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction
- Re: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction - next problem
- RE: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction
- Re: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction
- RE: facets
- Re: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction - next problem
- Re: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction
- Re: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction
- RE: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction
- Re: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction
- RE: Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction
- Problem with .NET - substitution group membership not allowed
- Problem with .NET - Invalid particle derivation by restriction
- DTD and namespaces
- Re: Enumeration component and restriction
- facets
Thursday, 9 October 2003
Wednesday, 8 October 2003
- Re: Do XML Schema processors verify schemas using XML Schema?
- Re: Do XML Schema processors verify schemas using XML Schema?
- Re: Do XML Schema processors verify schemas using XML Schema?
- linking from html to xsd
Tuesday, 7 October 2003
- RE: Do XML Schema processors verify schemas using XML Schema?
- RE: Do XML Schema processors verify schemas using XML Schema?
- RE: Do XML Schema processors verify schemas using XML Schema?
- RE: Do XML Schema processors verify schemas using XML Schema?
- Do XML Schema processors verify schemas using XML Schema?