- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:23:50 +0100
- To: "Nikola" <nikola.stojanovic@acm.org>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
"Nikola" <nikola.stojanovic@acm.org> writes:
> <Henry S. Thompson>
> Yeah, the two parts of the REC are in conflict here. I'll raise an
> official issue.
>
> The intended semantics are clear (it should be a restriction, after
> all), but the prose gets pretty confused.
> </Henry S. Thompson>
>
> Could you explain intended restriction semantics in a litlle bit different example. Here is the schema:
>
> <xs:simpleType name = "A">
> <xs:restriction base = "xs:token">
> <xs:enumeration value = "x"/>
> <xs:enumeration value = "y"/>
> <xs:enumeration value = "z"/>
> </xs:restriction>
> </xs:simpleType>
>
> <xs:simpleType name = "B">
> <xs:restriction base = "A">
> <xs:enumeration value = "blabla"/>
> </xs:restriction>
> </xs:simpleType>
>
> Is this valid? XSV (2.5-2 of 2003/07/09) reports no schema errors.
No, not valid. XSV doesn't check this, but it should.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Friday, 10 October 2003 04:23:51 UTC