- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 18:18:18 +0100
- To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Hugh Wallis" <hugh_wallis@hyperion.com>, "Priscilla Walmsley" <priscilla@walmsley.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>, "Rob Blake" <robblake@microsoft.com>
The more I thought about this, the less I thought I was right to let
.NET off the hook on this one, even though it's a subject that's been
discussed in great detail. Maybe it's just late on Friday and I'm not
too acute. . .
Anyway, here goes -- Dare, why doesn't the argument go like this:
Base particle (call it *B*, per Schema Component Constraint: Particle
Valid (Restriction) [1]):
Particle[
min: 1
max: 1
term: Model Group[compositor: sequence
particles: < Particle[min: 0
max: unbounded
term: Wildcard[...] ] > ]
Restricting particle (call it *R*, ditto):
Particle[
min: 1
max: 1
term: Model Group[compositor: sequence
particles: < Particle[min: 1
max: 1
term: ElementDecl[...] ],
Particle[min: 0
max: 1
term: ElementDecl[...] ] > ]
So lets work through Schema Component Constraint: Particle Valid
(Restriction) clause by clause:
1) They're not the same particle, so
2.1) No substitution groups involved;
2.2) Ignore pointless occurences
Aha! The top Particle of *B* is pointless:
2.2.2.1 is True (its min and max are 1)
2.2.2.2 is true, because 2.2.2.2.1 is true.
So now we proceed to the table, with the *B* which results from
ignoring the top Particle of the old *B*, i.e.
Particle[min: 0
max: unbounded
term: Wildcard[...] ]
So we take the box, which leads us to Schema Component Constraint:
Particle Derivation OK (All/Choice/Sequence:Any --
NSRecurseCheckCardinality) [2], which is clearly going to work.
So I claim you schema is actually OK, and .NET is wrong -- Dare?
ht
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#cos-particle-restrict
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#rcase-NSRecurseCheckCardinality
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Friday, 10 October 2003 13:27:23 UTC